Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have posted the details on here before but, as many of us know, the complaints process itself is not fit for purpose. I was told that privately by someone at Ofcom and my personal experience with the BBC confirms that view. Not all of the BBC is rogue but there is a specific culture problem in the digital sports team and the way it is overseen. It is not just bias. They make a lot of factual errors.
Anyone who complained about them taking the piss out of Pete the Badge knows what a bunch of lying scumbags they are.
 
So her lunatic theory is that Pep and all City's financial and legal team would spend days preparing a totally false bid for Rice to try and help their main title rivals buy an excellent player. Pep would do this as a personal favour to Arteta to help him undermine his own boss and his own club's owners. Yeh that sounds very true.
"Hey Pep. It's Mik."
" Hi Mik. What can I do for you?"
"Well I want Rice but my DOF won't budge, so I'd like you to make a bid, say £80m plus £10m in add-ons, and let the media know. That way, Edu might get his arse in gear and make a realistic offer."
"Sure thing matey. I'll just put you on hold while I give Moyesey a tinkle. I'll put him on speaker".
"Hey Davey. Great win in the Europa League. Congratulations. Listen, how about Declan Rice? We'll give you £80m plus around £10m in add-ons. How does that sound?"
"Nice try but no banana Pep old mate. We want £100m straight. No add-ons."
"OK. Let me put you on hold for a minute."
"Did you get that Mikky?"
"Got it recorded thanks."
"Great Mik. Back on hold for a moment."
"Hey Mik. Sorry - Davey. No deal I'm afraid but you might be hearing from Arteta shortly, once we've finished our chinwag anyway. Speak soon."
"Hi Mik. Now, where were we....?"
 
Last edited:
And it just goes on, more than one outlet now carrying a headline "Eni Oluko suspects foul plat in man City approach for Rice", fucking shameless skunks making an issue out of anything that braindead woman comes out with.
Somehow, yet again, we are the bad guys !
 
Fucking hilarious how even a positive subject matter about City's net spend can be worded (both in headline and the leading paragraphs) to actually sound negative for us but positive for the rags.

I'm reading it completely confused as to what the journo was trying to do with the article.

 
Fucking hilarious how even a positive subject matter about City's net spend can be worded (both in headline and the leading paragraphs) to actually sound negative for us but positive for the rags.

I'm reading it completely confused as to what the journo was trying to do with the article.

And not one mention of player cost for the rags.
 
Is this the same dozy cow who said that a player who had scored 25 goals in 50 worked out at a goal a game ?? Then all her media colleagues rounded on her critics saying they were sexist and misogynistic because they quite rightfully pulled her up ?? No it's not sexist to criticise someone who gets paid good money for providing insight, when they're as thick as a Twyfords piss-stone !!!
 
BBC again.

After lying and posting false news re the Rags demonstration yesterday, you know the one with about 10 people and Salford Stone calling it a noisy protest ( should be sacked for making inaccurate stories up but it sums up the entire BBC), and running a recent story on how good Mount is ( despite no one else interested in signing him) i now see todays article is Gvardiol, is he worth 100 million euros as the headline and above it Arsenal bid 105 million for Rice ( no mention of is he worth it).

Its time the club seriously told the BBC where to go and ban them from the ground as its pathetic how they report on red tops and us
 
Her article in the Guardian about Pep approximately four years ago was equally poorly reasoned. She asserted that in order to be regarded equal to Klopp, Pep needed to secure another Champions League victory.

All the while McCoist is desperately trying not to laugh.
 
BBC again.

After lying and posting false news re the Rags demonstration yesterday, you know the one with about 10 people and Salford Stone calling it a noisy protest ( should be sacked for making inaccurate stories up but it sums up the entire BBC), and running a recent story on how good Mount is ( despite no one else interested in signing him) i now see todays article is Gvardiol, is he worth 100 million euros as the headline and above it Arsenal bid 105 million for Rice ( no mention of is he worth it).

Its time the club seriously told the BBC where to go and ban them from the ground as its pathetic how they report on red tops and us
Not Sky? Or the Sun, TS, or any of the other media?
I dont know why the bbc gets mentioned so much when its across the board, and even worse in most cases... I mean Sky have a vested interest in seeing utd and lfc top of the table. Their "features" section is almost constantly (and only) about Neville's or Carraghers teams. Talksport dont even have City reps on, they fill their airwaves with 90s "stars" obvs ars/lfc/utd.
 
Klopp 4 trophies in 8 seasons.

Pep 12 trophies in 7 seasons.

That is all.
but.... Klopps 4 trophies were all got with 11 players all born and bred on Toxteth or Kirkdale who get the bus to the ground with the fans, where as... the only reason we have won trophies is because we have kidnapped all the players parents/kids and pay them all at least £10m a week as well (£100m a week for Haaland). Also, every player we have was wanted by other big clubs but we blew them out of the water with vastly inflated transfer amounts that nobody else pays
Keep up...!! :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top