Silvatoure21
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 436
Of course an osu fan would be for bringing down Michigan. But scouting an opponent and hamburgers would not be the hill I would die on.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
BeerIsTheBest
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2018
- Messages
- 2,154
Tolmie
During your intel gathering have you heard anything about the Independent Footie Regulator. Last I read a month or so back was that the gvmt had concluded it’s consultation, had prepared a White Paper and would debate the matter when Parliamentary time allowed.
Could easily see it kicked forward to beyond the next election?.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Labour also support an independent regulator so it will probably happen eventually but not under this government
Ray bloody Purchase
Well-Known Member
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
So the rags,red scousers and arse have been demanding updates on City‘s case and when it will be heard,well maybe we should now be demanding when the premier league will investigate the rags for the failure of FFP,what’s good for the goose and all that ..
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Tainted? ONLY in the view of City haters.If it was Stretford United in the Dock I'd be the same, I don't need Universal approval I can see with my own eyes how the club is evolving as a "tainted" brand!.
Either they were not punished or it’s a new club, you can’t have it both ways.
The Everton case is complete bullshit.
The relegated clubs want Everton punished for breaking FFP after they got relegated.
But you can’t punish someone for a crime they hadn’t committed yet. Everton’s books were checked and were fine for the season in question (21/22).
The fact they broke FFP the next season is completely irrelevant.
I’d be pretty worried for our case if the independent panel side with the relegated sides.
If Sunak was going to bring one in, he’d have announced it as part of the policy vomit during the conference where he just chucked any half baked ideas they had at the wall to see what stuck.
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,614
How's that?
Their club liquidated, a new club formed and duly started from the bottom tier of the senior pyramid. What's the punishment?
you’ve just explained how the punishment was either being dissolved or being relegated 4 tiers.
Wonder if this has any bearing on Pep being rather chipper in yesterday’s press conference : )
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,614
Liquidation isn't a punishment though? The footballing authorities have absolutely zero say in whether a business liquidates or not.
They were liquidated as a consequence of financial mismanagement which meant that they could no longer afford to survive.
I'm baffled that some are seeing any kind of similarities to our own predicament here.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
FFP is accessed Over 3 seasons with a limit on cumulative loss which in Everton’s case was 372m the limit being 105m Everton claimed that Covid was the reason for the excess yet it’s considerable more than any other club have claimed The clubs relegated last season are awaiting the outcome with compensation claims being considered
it’s not happening.
They cleared FFP in 21/22. With the covid exceptions yes, but those were cleared.
The relegated clubs are upset that they failed the next season and think they should be entitled to compensation for a breach Everton hadn’t even made when they got relegated.
It’s not going to happen.
How would insiders at Everton know about our case?
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
No such insight on that time frame mate.