gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Yes, upon reflection worthless was an injudicious choice of word, even if caveated with ‘relatively‘ but the land in neither fertile nor replete with natural resources, my point being that if human beings will argue over such territory what will it be like elsewhere when resources such as water start to diminish.Palestine wasn’t barren land in the late 1800s. The Palestinians, and this was the major Arab with Jews minority, were building from libraries to schools, from the modern train and railway by Chemin Ottoman and then Deutsche bank in the 1890s, to the mediterranean and far east import/export trade.
Palestine is far from a worthless land. Rather it is one of the few land before B.C that had proper architecture and high population. Richard the Lionheart of the Crusades conquerors and Salah ad-Din of having controlled Palestine were agreeing peace treaty. But even prior to King Richard, and any Byzatine attacks, the Palestine managed by Salah ad-Din was in favour of the Palestine Arabs, Palestine Christians and Palestine Jew as a harmonised community, no major issues against one of the Abrahamic religions.
Not sure your history lesson, as enlightening as it was, takes my point anywhere tbh.