Try having that conversation with a scouser! They deny it ever happened!Liverpool had FFP problems eight years which was soon hushed up ha. All teams guilty of it imn sure just some getting picked
He definitely did say “objective”. Jordan got it wrong trying to correct him and made himself look a bigger mug than we already know he is.Still not convinced Stefan doesn’t initially say objective, then again, my hearing is shit and I’ve not spoken to many well spoken types in years.
Either way, a really poor ‘power play’ from Jordan which Stefan just brushed off.
Thanks for that mate and what a very interesting listen.talkSPORT Web Player - Listen Live | talkSPORT
Tune in for Live Sports Commentaries, Exclusive Breaking News, Opinion and More. Take a look through our schedule or listen back to anything you missed.talksport.com
??The clue is in the thread title ;)
That's where Stefan was excellent in my opinion - on the cooperation charge. Jordan has often pushed this point about us being guilty because we were fined by CAS. He thinks a lack of cooperation means we're guilty, which is something I'd expect the average football fan to think. But he's been through litigation himself enough times to know this is completely different and Stefan explained the fact that it's a common approach not to share information and to stymie another party and Jordan accepted that ultimately - a big win!
I also note, after listening back that when Jordan corrected Stefan on his use of subjective rather than objective he'd misheard him as Stefan did say objective in the first place. That reveals so much about Jordan's ego and his clear insecurities.
I missed it first time round but on listening again it did sound like he said “that’s objective”, thanks for clearing it up.He definitely did say “objective”. Jordan got it wrong trying to correct him and made himself look a bigger mug than we already know he is.
Am with you I wish he didn't give them a headline. I don't think the Premier League would shot itself in the foot by getting rid of usJust wish he hadn't given the soundbite of "There's no way this doesn't end without relegation."
I've not listened myself but are you not truncating what he actually said.Just wish he hadn't given the soundbite of "There's no way this doesn't end without relegation."
He qualified it after the fact but I believe he was asked what he thinks would happen and his immediate response was that sentence.I've not listened myself but are you not truncating what he actually said.
It was a small comment in order to stress the seriousness of the accusations which he went on to say were very unlikely to be true or, indeed, proved. But as per - the headlines twist the extract to make it sound as if our one time advisor thinks we will be relegated.I've not listened myself but are you not truncating what he actually said.
That's what I thought, strange that a Blue should be repeating that as true.It was a small comment in order to stress the seriousness of the accusations which he went on to say were very unlikely to be true or, indeed, proved. But as per - the headlines twist the extract to make it sound as if our one time advisor thinks we will be relegated.
Clever & evil actions by a hateful radio station
They were only after a negative & would have found one somehow - but they were unable to prevent you getting the truth across about the whole situationThanks all for the comments. I feel it is not credible (especially as I have said it before), to dance around what happens if everything is proven. It is the key part of why I don't believe they will ultimately prove the allegations. And nobody can be in doubt as to the seriousness now post Everton if we are found to have breached these rules on a wholesale basis for a decade. I know it is not a good soundbite and yes this is a little naive but it is difficult to tread that line.