Its the just because you want it to be true doesnt make it true argument , by his logic everytime villa had a shot at goal then it would be a goal because they had tried to score then they should score or everytime he tried to make an intelligent cogent argument thats what it would be instead of the nonsensical bollocks which is what they are replying with.Does anyone have an answer that kills the "no smoke without fire" argument? I mean aside from the obvious!
View attachment 113414
