PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Ballosteve]

Things must be going badly for the Premier league in 115 case as this poor excuse for a journalist talking shite and it's old news...

 

[Pablo ZZZ Peroni]

Full link to the Times article here:

https://archive.ph/AFb5z

There are a few different FOI requests and responses revealed.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Sounds like they’re laying the ground for a few “well we all know they were guilty as fuck but governments got involved, too much political drama, so they let them off with it. Money talks innit” articles when we get cleared.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Sounds like they’re laying the ground for a few “well we all know they were guilty as fuck but governments got involved, too much political drama, so they let them off with it. Money talks innit” articles when we get cleared.

Does this face look bovvered ?

 

[oakiecokie]

interesting:

Guilty = no foreign trade. ;)

 

[Stoned Rose]

Does this face look bovvered ?

Pics?

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Pics?

You'd be better off using your imagination :)

 

[KS55]

Thing about this is if the independent schools can afford Lord Pannick why are they bothered about the VAT rise ?. This suggests they are rich enough to not have to pass on to the parents ?

In total, maybe. Individually, no chance. They have seen withdrawals already due to the prospect of increased fees.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

Didn't we already know this months ago ?

It’s an old story. You would expect this to happen as a matter of routine. Khaldoon runs one of the Abu Dhabi Sovereign Wealth Funds which invests hundreds of millions in the UK. The Embassy will always be working on trade deals and the 115 case could damage relations. Of course the Embassy would be interested. This is what Embassies do. It is a desperate story by Ziegler. I wonder who prompted this story and what was their motive.

Didn't we already know this months ago ?

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

In total, maybe. Individually, no chance. They have seen withdrawals already due to the prospect of increased fees.

Which is a shame for the kids whose parents can't afford to pay, and possibly depriving their kids of a better chance in the future.

Difficult one .

 

[citizen_maine]

Which is a shame for the kids whose parents can't afford to pay, and possibly depriving their kids of a better chance in the future.

Difficult one .

There's a thread for this

 

[KS55]

Which is a shame for the kids whose parents can't afford to pay, and possibly depriving their kids of a better chance in the future.

Difficult one .

I’m not a great supporter of private education but in a free country, you can’t go around banning things just because you don’t like them. It seems to me that it is unfair to charge VAT on private school fees while all supplies to LA schools are VAT free.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

There's a thread for this

Sorry I hadn't noticed which thread I was on .

 

[KS55]

Guilty = no foreign trade. ;)

It’s a classic Ziegler, signifying nothing. Did he expect our gov simply to ignore the situation while not knowing the attitude of UAE on whom we currently rely for large inward investment?

 

[pirate]

I’m not a great supporter of private education but in a free country, you can’t go around banning things just because you don’t like them. It seems to me that it is unfair to charge VAT on private school fees while all supplies to LA schools are VAT free.

just think about that for a minute
who receives the VAT?
Who pays for the supplies to the LA schools?
the answer to both is the government, charging vat to LA school supplies just adds admin fees with no benefit to anyone

 

[manimanc]

Full link to the Times article here:

https://archive.ph/AFb5z

There are a few different FOI requests and responses revealed.

Slaphead trying to stay relevant when in reality he hasn't got a fuckin clue what is going on.

 

[KS55]

just think about that for a minute
who receives the VAT?
Who pays for the supplies to the LA schools?
the answer to both is the government, charging vat to LA school supplies just adds admin fees with no benefit to anyone

The sensible answer therefore would be not to charge private schools, then.

 

[citizen_maine]

just think about that for a minute
who receives the VAT?
Who pays for the supplies to the LA schools?
the answer to both is the government, charging vat to LA school supplies just adds admin fees with no benefit to anyone

There's a thread for this

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

There's a thread for this

Honestly some bloody posters ! :)

 

[denislawsbackheel]

I’m not a great supporter of private education but in a free country, you can’t go around banning things just because you don’t like them. It seems to me that it is unfair to charge VAT on private school fees while all supplies to LA schools are VAT free.

Nobody has banned anything!