jaymcfc1968
Well-Known Member
I’m pretty sure he means the supermarket not the country.You went to Iceland and ate pizza, garlic bread and chips? Good Lord .....
Expensive it is, though.
I’m pretty sure he means the supermarket not the country.You went to Iceland and ate pizza, garlic bread and chips? Good Lord .....
Expensive it is, though.
Why am i suddenly getting a sense of droit du seigneur about this thread?Fuck those dwellers!
Possibly. Although if we were cleared after such a semingly substantive investigation, a PL appeal which would cost even more money might be viewed as extremely frivolous by the members...So the delay could work in either parties benefit in terms of an appeal?
I’m pretty sure he means the supermarket not the country.
Better than the putrid shark and cormorantYou went to Iceland and ate pizza, garlic bread and chips? Good Lord .....
Expensive it is, though.
I THINK that they are making a joke by referencing a uk supermarket called iceland (basically they sell low quality frozen food hence the references to pizza etc.) and not a slight against the country.You dont have to come again mate, we have way to many turist as is
Not really, in the sense hardly much benefit to either.So the delay could work in either parties benefit in terms of an appeal?
Thanks, and cheers for the link. Appreciate it.Not in my view - I think we would be in unsafe decision territory if it happened. The article is here too https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/the-115-decision-doa-before-its-even
The delay unreliability point opens up the potential for the league to spin this out still further if they don’t get us on the major points. Wouldn’t put it past themThanks, and cheers for the link. Appreciate it.
I think most football fans know it is vindictive. But it has effectively besmirched us for years now which quite plausibly was the intention all along. The damage this has done to the club is incalculableNot really, in the sense hardly much benefit to either.
If we are found guilty and challenge it on the grounds that too much time makes the judgement unclear, the best we get (as I read that) is a retrail. So another who knows how long if uncertainty, but this time with a guilty banner hanging over the club.
And if the PL appeal on those grounds, they are wasting more money at it and comeing off vindictive.
Only joking, matey. Been there once, btw. Loved it. Beautiful place. The girls are stunning and the guys are always pissed :)
If it was negative towards City it would leak out via the tradtional route. Someone at the PL tells one of the cartel club directors and they ask someone in their comms team to verbally brief a pal in the media. Of course this is harder to do these days now that Lewis and Levy have left, United are not playing ball any more, and Rick Parry is isolated at the EFL. The Times or New York Times would have the story by now if the result was out and negative to City.I don't think hundreds of people at the club will know to leak it.
It is most likely someone at the club will know a few hours to a day before it is announced, and it won't be a open secret for months like with JG.
The only thing that seems to be leaking is nervous fans. Tena are making a fortune.
Surely this is the crux of the matter. If we were guilty then Khaldoon would have been happy to settle at some point.You know a great deal more about these processes than any of us in here, but I would add one thing. Khaldoon has something more than just an impressionistic view of how things went, he knows whether we did "it".
Now whether we did "it" or not might have no bearing on the outcome of the process at all, but the knowledge we're innocent, regardless of the panel's verdict, will definitely inform all of Khaldoon's decisions regarding investment in the club going forward, appeals and whatnot. Khaldoon chose to spend big and bring in the best to defend our corner and that might be, as our detractors claim, simply because we can, or it might, as I believe, be born of indignation. When I watch Khaldoon and maybe this is my blue tinted specs, I see a man that's not just confident that the Premier League can't prove we're guilty I see a man who knows we're innocent.
Its not Joe Lewis from Spurs. It was Tim Lewis from Arsenal.I don’t know about Levy but Lewis’s step back from Spurs coincided with insider trading charges in the US with the potential of it being a protracted and costly issue. Due to his age (late 80s), I think it’s far more likely that his stepping back from Spurs was more related to protecting his legacy for his family and separating the family’s ownership from his personal interests to prevent any potential legal action against him dragging it in. I also suspect the insider trading charges were of greater concern to him than charges against City, and hence his focus was not on our case in the slightest.
Now that's a cool pub nameBetter than the putrid shark and cormorant
This is what I dont understand, surely they know how it went. Did PL proof that City are quilty or not. Everyone who was at the trial must know. I just cant see how there is some doubts.Knowing how they think it went, and knowing the outcome, are two very very different things. Having the verdict is a third altogether.
they'll have wife/ rent boy typing up like mp's keep money wages in houseI haven't worked in an office for quite awhile but im sure they still employ cleaners.
Further, no way is some posh bastard typing his own report up.
When I worked in an office if I wanted to know what was happening I'd simply ask the cleaner or the typist.
Failing that I'd screw the bosses office after he'd gone home.
19 months and no one has done either ! No wonder this countries fucked.
To damn honest, thats the problem
The nuances of this have been done to death on here mate.This is what I dont understand, surely they know how it went. Did PL proof that City are quilty or not. Everyone who was at the trial must know. I just cant see how there is some doubts.