Club Badge (merged)

dasein said:
Judging by the response of some posters on here you'd piss of loads of people if you
A.- keep the eagle
B.- don't keep the eagle

So what do we do we do?
Click to expand...

For me it's keep the eagle or change to a round badge. Whichever got the most votes is what we should go for.

The sure fire wire of pissing off pretty much everyone is by trying to do both and squeezing an eagle in to a round badge.

That's certainly not anyone's first choice, and it's the design most likely to piss the most people off.
 
Shaelumstash said:
For me it's keep the eagle or change to a round badge. Whichever got the most votes is what we should go for.

The sure fire wire of pissing off pretty much everyone is by trying to do both and squeezing an eagle in to a round badge.

That's certainly not anyone's first choice, and it's the design most likely to piss the most people off.
Click to expand...

I'm an eagle hater, always despised it. But we either update one of the old badges or stay with what we have. We cannot update something that the majority dislike
 
Shaelumstash said:
That is fucking beautiful!

It would be even better without the eagle's head, but the colour scheme is the best I've seen.

I think it needs something to break up the gaps on the side of the circle, whether simple dots, bees, 1894, roses whatever, but it needs something.

But the core design and colour scheme of this is absolutely spot on imo.
Click to expand...

FC after Manchester City & 1894 at the bottom of the circle?
 
Pell not Pep ;-) said:
Not quite 100%. Joking aside though it'll be interesting to know what the next stage will be. I hope it comes down to a vote for season ticket holders, cityzens and members. Can't really see a fairer way of doing things than that. I don't agree the club have already made up their minds about what the badge will look like. I hope their are two or three to vote on then there's no argument about what is and isnt fair. If the eagle gets the vote I'll be gutted but im chuffed to bits what's happened to City the last seven years so it's about the bigger picture. Btw I'm only trying to inject a bit of humour with my posts. What's happening in the world at the moment is so sad so why not try and have a laugh along the way.
Click to expand...
amen to that brother ,eagle it is then
 
Pell not Pep ;-) said:
Not quite 100%. Joking aside though it'll be interesting to know what the next stage will be. I hope it comes down to a vote for season ticket holders, cityzens and members. Can't really see a fairer way of doing things than that. I don't agree the club have already made up their minds about what the badge will look like. I hope their are two or three to vote on then there's no argument about what is and isnt fair. If the eagle gets the vote I'll be gutted but im chuffed to bits what's happened to City the last seven years so it's about the bigger picture. Btw I'm only trying to inject a bit of humour with my posts. What's happening in the world at the moment is so sad so why not try and have a laugh along the way.
Click to expand...
amen to that brother ,eagle it is then
 
Pell not Pep ;-) said:
FC after Manchester City & 1894 at the bottom of the circle?
Click to expand...

Personally mate I like the "Football Club" bit written out like the NYCFC and Melbourne badges, gives it a bit of consistency.

If the 1894 was included, I'd have 18 at 9 o'clock and the 94 at 3 o'clock on the circle. I was never bothered about including the date, but I actually think it would open a lot of people's mind's around the world who have been force fed mass media garbage that we're a "petro club" that didn't exist before 2008.

Even in Germany when I went away to Dortmund we were chatting to some of their fans who thought we were a new club that had only been around for a few years.

Incuding the date might be a good and simple way of educating people that we're a club with a long history and encourage people to look in to it a bit more.
 
not our job to educate ignorant fans of other teams of our history ... the badge is for us, not them.
 
Gary James said:
Thanks. I wouldn't get hung up on the German use of the Iron Cross, it predates Gorton AFC anyway from what I remember from my lessons on Bismark at school, but in terms of Gorton its appearance on the shirt is unclear. It could be connected to religion, it could be connected to freemasonry (my 'gut' feel), and some have even suggested it's connected to a campaign for men/boys to refrain from self abuse (I kid you not!). On Anna Connell... I've covered that in detail in Amazon product ASIN 0955812771. The opening chapters are free to read in the Look Inside function.
Click to expand...

and some have even suggested it's connected to a campaign for men/boys to refrain from self abuse (I kid you not!)

So the fans could have worn that cross pre 2008.
 
GeekinGav said:
not our job to educate ignorant fans of other teams of our history ... the badge is for us, not them.
Click to expand...

I disagree.

The badge should represent the city and also represent the club.

For me the ship and 3 river shield represent the city.

The sky blue and white colour scheme of my preferred badge represent the club, and I think the date would also represent the club and it's long and valuable history.

The main purpose of the badge is to represent the club, but if we can shatter some misconceptions in the process it's no bad thing.

Without sounding to American marketing consultant, the badge is our branding, and if there are misconceptions about our brand (namely that the club was founded in 2008) then including the 1894 date of inception squashes that myth straight away which for me is a positive thing.
 
i dont give a toss about idiots in the world that think we started when ADUG bought us, if they think that, then they arent proper football fans. ... our badge is for us, not designed for other fans to look at it and think ... oh why a ship, why 3 stripes, oh when were they formed, what does the eagle stand for?? .... frankly, they dont give a shit.

worry about what we want, sod everyone else who isnt associated the club or potential fans for the time being. Sort out the here and now. Focus on who really matter, not some if/who/whatever .... if you cant get it right for the present then the future is fucked either way.

rant over .... i'm going back to more important things to worry about now.
 
GeekinGav said:
i dont give a toss about idiots in the world that think we started when ADUG bought us, if they think that, then they arent proper football fans. ... our badge is for us, not designed for other fans to look at it and think ... oh why a ship, why 3 stripes, oh when were they formed, what does the eagle stand for?? .... frankly, they dont give a shit.

worry about what we want, sod everyone else who isnt associated the club or potential fans for the time being. Sort out the here and now. Focus on who really matter, not some if/who/whatever .... if you cant get it right for the present then the future is fucked either way.

rant over .... i'm going back to more important things to worry about now.
Click to expand...

Not sure why so angry.

Of course the badge is for the fans, but whether we want it to be or not, it's also representative of the club to the rest of the world.
 
Badge%20Vector%20Golden%20Eagle.jpg


Any better with a golden eagle instead of an american bald eagle?
 
Shaelumstash said:
Personally mate I like the "Football Club" bit written out like the NYCFC and Melbourne badges, gives it a bit of consistency.

If the 1894 was included, I'd have 18 at 9 o'clock and the 94 at 3 o'clock on the circle. I was never bothered about including the date, but I actually think it would open a lot of people's mind's around the world who have been force fed mass media garbage that we're a "petro club" that didn't exist before 2008.

Even in Germany when I went away to Dortmund we were chatting to some of their fans who thought we were a new club that had only been around for a few years.

Incuding the date might be a good and simple way of educating people that we're a club with a long history and encourage people to look in to it a bit more.
Click to expand...


I think writing football club wastes too much space. FC for me. Don't like 1894 split either as it reads as two seperate numbers. Wish I could upload the rose badge I found to show you what I mean but it doesn't work. I uploaded it a hundred or so pages back lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top