Its about time we ignored the fucker.He`s either a sandwich short of a picnic or a fucking troll.
I'm going for both
Its about time we ignored the fucker.He`s either a sandwich short of a picnic or a fucking troll.
I have a feeling that both him and the sheriff are a wolf in sheeps clothing.I'm going for both
And yet another sceptic.He signed with us thinking, yeah i'll dominate this league win a boatload of trophies and be on my merry way
6 months later...
Backs into Khaldoons office like Chief Brody and mutters I'm gonna need a longer contract
And yet another sceptic.
Think the contract extension was agreed when he signedHe signed with us thinking, yeah i'll dominate this league win a boatload of trophies and be on my merry way
6 months later...
Backs into Khaldoons office like Chief Brody and mutters I'm gonna need a longer contract
Think the contract extension was agreed when he signed
Cheers guys. My view is different to yours so I'm wrong, I get it. You just missed the rag tag for the final nail.I have a feeling that both him and the sheriff are a wolf in sheeps clothing.
Don't watch, listen to or read any of those.
The core of our squad were from Mancini's era, that they are aging can't be (and isn't) disputable.
Ad homenim to further degrade your nonsensical rantings. How entirely unsurprising.
You are negative. You have been negative in every single City thread you've posted in, even following victories. That anyone could be negative following our come-from-behind victory against Arsenal or the first time we beat Barcelona, beggars belief. You did. That makes me feel you're negative. Or a rag. Both?
Nobody disagrees with this.
The difference between you and anyone else is that most accept that he has to be given time to deliver, certainly longer than the half a season you've waited to vomit your negative bile all over this forum.
Seems the club agrees. Sorry.
Try moving away from the word "factual". Forecasting is not factual but probable.Sorry, I must have missed that. All I've seen is what he did in Spain and Germany plus a couple of flashes here and there with us.
I haven't seen anything factual about how we are developing in a positive way, just that its not his team, it will come good and give him time. I accept those viewpoints but they're not exactly factual.
Lots of contracts have options for either party to trigger an extension. Nothing unusual if that is what's happened. Maybe he has maybe he hasn't and it's a new contract. Either way it's good news.So in his initial contract it said he'd sign an extension in January?..What's the fucking point in that..Why not sign a 4/5 year deal?
I'm sure it isn't the plan, but it shows that missing out is hardly the end of the world.I know that is tongue in cheek but it can't be any part of the plan, surely.
I understand the decision to replace Hart but I've also started to doubt whether or not Bravo will come good. For all his faults though, I think using the shots/goals ratio against him is a little bit harsh. A lot of the goals we're conceding seem to come as a result of us being completely carved open by the opposition after some extremely sloppy play in our own half. These aren't speculative shots on goal he's having to face, they're golden opportunities handed to our opponents due to the failings of our outfield players. He hasn't particularly impressed me and he doesn't seem commanding enough in the box, but the goals we're letting in aren't all his fault either.
3 year contract with an option to extend signed in the summerSo in his initial contract it said he'd sign an extension in January?..What's the fucking point in that..Why not sign a 4/5 year deal?
3 year contract with an option to extend signed in the summer