This is true.The difference is pep has started Nunes in a game we had to win pep hasn't started Philips in any game that we have to win! This means pep trusts Nunes he knows he can improve him, he takes what pep tells him on Board!
I watched Nunes particularly closely this game because i was curious what skill set city saw in him . He's got great control and pace over a short distance. He can dribble. His short range passing is quick and forward usually but 50/50 accuracy. He loses possession easily when under pressure. He has a shit shot. Works hard. Has a quality dentist. The Jury is adjourned until 2024.
What agenda?Strangely quiet in here, guess today's performance didn't suit certain agendas enough
Agenda may have been a poor choice of word but people seem to have this obsession with wanting to right players off before they're even been given a chance. Instead of objectively trying to look at a player and see what they could bring they're instantly deemed a level below and not good enough time and time again. Thats despite what we've seen with adjustment periods etc. I just find it strange how threads are flooded with negativity after certain games but then after a good performance people are reluctant to praise. Players can look below par and have bad games but I just can't get on board with the black and white answer of he's crap or not at our level. Would much rather try and take positive and look for signs of where players can help a team / be an important player. Nunes today showed for me what I've said for a while that he has some really good tools and it was only highlighted having de bruyne around him.What agenda?
You need to factor in the opposition. When he performs against a challenger either domestically or in a meaningful match in the champions league you may have a pointAgenda may have been a poor choice of word but people seem to have this obsession with wanting to right players off before they're even been given a chance. Instead of objectively trying to look at a player and see what they could bring they're instantly deemed a level below and not good enough time and time again. Thats despite what we've seen with adjustment periods etc. I just find it strange how threads are flooded with negativity after certain games but then after a good performance people are reluctant to praise. Players can look below par and have bad games but I just can't get on board with the black and white answer of he's crap or not at our level. Would much rather try and take positive and look for signs of where players can help a team / be an important player. Nunes today showed for me what I've said for a while that he has some really good tools and it was only highlighted having de bruyne around him.
I think you read too much in to it.Agenda may have been a poor choice of word but people seem to have this obsession with wanting to right players off before they're even been given a chance. Instead of objectively trying to look at a player and see what they could bring they're instantly deemed a level below and not good enough time and time again. Thats despite what we've seen with adjustment periods etc. I just find it strange how threads are flooded with negativity after certain games but then after a good performance people are reluctant to praise. Players can look below par and have bad games but I just can't get on board with the black and white answer of he's crap or not at our level. Would much rather try and take positive and look for signs of where players can help a team / be an important player. Nunes today showed for me what I've said for a while that he has some really good tools and it was only highlighted having de bruyne around him.