There are no comparisons with Rodri's first season. The comparisons are in the similarity between comments made in the performance threads of both players. Both players were unfairly judged on their early performances, and it is a pattern here from some posters. Opinions are valid, of course, but forming one that declares that a player will never be good enough, one who has played a total of 293m of football for us, and is recovering from injury and operations, is ridiculous, in my view.I think the comparisons with Rodri's first season are ridiculous. In 15 minutes you could see so much quality in Rodri, and it was obvious that he just lacked the physicality of PL, and it was just about time to adapt to it. Really, I invite anyone who makes that stupid comparison to go and watch Rodri's first match (against Liverpool!!) and he was great that match. With 90 min, you don't get the full picture, but you get a really good idea of the strengths and weaknesses of a player, and Kalvin is not a player for us. Especially when we talk about DM!!
How many players do you know of that have received early criticism but gone on to be great players for us? Gundogan, Rodri, Silva...the list goes on and on.
Last edited: