Kippax Street 1880
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 5,087
I don't know if that story is true but it does allude to what I said earlier about unaswered questions. I apologise if anyone finds my thoughts disgusting but I would like to know why the BBC announced that building 7 had collapsed before it happened. It's quite possible that the BBC were told that it would be demolished by the fire department due to it being unstable or something similar but that isn't what we were told.
I am also surprised that there were never more pictures of the plane approaching/hitting the Pentagon released given that it must be one of most camera saturated sites in the USA and all footage from surrounding sites was immediately confiscated.
I won't ramble any more it was a horrible day but not all the non-offical government stuff on the Internet is tripe.
It took decades for the Warren comission report to be properly contradicted and an admission made that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone. Governments do have a haibt of making the facts suit their objectives, remember Iraq's 'weapons of mass destriction' ?
Maybe 50 years from now some of the questions around 9/11 may be answered.
There is a lot of things that raise concern for me aswell. The Pentagon crash having no footage is weird. Tower 7 is weird. The entire US Air force being on a training exercise in Alaska on 9/11 is weird. I don't want to believe the American Government would let something like that happen to their own citizens, but the world is a dark and murky place and we will probably never really know. I don't think your thoughts are disgusting at all, wanting to know the full truth of what happened that day isn't disrespectful in my opinion.