I'm not really sure how to respond to someone who chooses not absorb conversation. I asked you to reveal your experience of being in a similar situation as to what I discussed. You chose to say "...typical assumption you jump to, knowing other people's experiences. Every time! You are the only authority on discrimination sexism violence and everything that poor sheltered everyone else has no comprehension of."
Not even close to anything I said. But, you do you, Boo. I hope you feel amazing from it.
And my adding of "scrotes" changed after I saw the second contextual video and violence emitted. The violence was unacceptable, but that's me having better context and not assuming like you did from the off.
That does not excuse the actions of the policeman after containing the suspect.
So, let me ask again the question ignored earlier about feeling 'threatened' and not 'angry'; why didn't he deploy a second taser rather than kick and stamp the man...??
I think it is impossible for you or I to determine whether he was angry, threatened, or both.
It is easier to comment whether the situation was under control or if the guy was bo longer a threat. And I thinknhe still was and that was a step in getting control of the situation. As we see by his further need to restrain him evena fter the kick.