You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bruno Guimaraes
- Thread starter Nethermoor
- Start date
Opinion only but again the evidence is pointing towards Bruno G staying at Newcastle unless the club is going to pay way over the odds. The chance to sign him went with the deadline. Same with Olmo.You appear to be making very definitive statements as if you have first hand knowledge of the ins and outs of this
" transfer speculation ".
I suspect that is why some are making counter suggestions - ie speculation imo.
Do you have reliable first-hand knowledge on the subject or just voicing your own opinion ?
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,223
- Team supported
- Manchester City
They no longer need to sell. They have satisfied the PSR requriements. I'll leave it as there a few are baiting me in this thread.
Tbh I don't believe they are baiting you .
You are making very strong comments rather than expressing them as your own opinion.
Unless you have actual first-hand, reliable knowledge of the thinking of the Newcastle board ?
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,223
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Tbh I don't believe they are baiting you .
You are making very strong comments rather than expressing them as your own opinion.
Unless you have actual first-hand, reliable knowledge of the thinking of the Newcastle board ?
Sorry bit of a duplication and clumsy fingers on intial post.
Same could be said about making strong comments on City being back for Bruno G to be honest as well. Especially with him buying a new place despite signing a new deal with said clause. Again not worth paying more than the original £100m price.Tbh I don't believe they are baiting you .
You are making very strong comments rather than expressing them as your own opinion.
Unless you have actual first-hand, reliable knowledge of the thinking of the Newcastle board ?
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,223
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Opinion only but again the evidence is pointing towards Bruno G staying at Newcastle unless the club is going to pay way over the odds. The chance to sign him went with the deadline. Same with Olmo.
Ok thanks.
I'm sure you can appreciate that others may not share your opinion, and believe that there are negotiations/discussions going on between City and other parties ?
City are not like the rags in their negotiations :)
Spanishbob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2020
- Messages
- 1,447
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I will let you all into a little secret. I’ve got it info from people at the club that Messi has lied about his birth date and is actually only 21yrs. Apparently he is open to renewing is interest in joing City this season because he can’t speak with an American accent and it’s upsetting him. Meanwhile I have to go feed my pink unicorn. If anybody dare call me a liar I will with deep prejudice fuck you all off. Sent from my bar stool in deepest spain.
Even with the release clause? Other teams weren't tempted with it either. It would have been cheaper then than this current time. Newcastle will fleece any interested clubs and he has a signifcant time left on his new deal.Ok thanks.
I'm sure you can appreciate that others may not share your opinion, and believe that there are negotiations/discussions going on between City and other parties ?
City are not like the rags in their negotiations :)
Mancityphilfo2000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2021
- Messages
- 392
- Team supported
- City
Try an Lay of the sangria bob!:))I will let you all into a little secret. I’ve got it info from people at the club that Messi has lied about his birth date and is actually only 21yrs. Apparently he is open to renewing is interest in joing City this season because he can’t speak with an American accent and it’s upsetting him. Meanwhile I have to go feed my pink unicorn. If anybody dare call me a liar I will with deep prejudice fuck you all off. Sent from my bar stool in deepest spain.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,223
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Even with the release clause? Other teams weren't tempted with it either. It would have been cheaper then than this current time. Newcastle will fleece any interested clubs and he has a signifcant time left on his new deal.
No problem, I guess time will tell .
You are right mate, thick skin is something I don’t have. Especially when it comes to doing something with good Intention. I don’t disrespect anyone and I expect the same treatment.
And that is why I have decided to no longer put myself in that position. At least here on Bluemoon.
If it is with good intentions and for the good of other blues, does it really matter whether you get praise and appreciation or sarcasm? Two sides of the same coin, really.
Opinion only but again the evidence is pointing towards Bruno G staying at Newcastle unless the club is going to pay way over the odds. The chance to sign him went with the deadline. Same with Olmo.
They'll look at our squad and Kovacic who for me was doing a great job and he can play the 8, 6 role Silva can play in there to so I can see why we didn't trigger the 100m buyout
Don`t blame Txiki for the Kane deal, that was his piss head of an agent, his brother, who upset the apple cart with that slimy twat of a Chairman.
We didn`t do too badly with Kanes "replacement", a certain Haaland.
I knew somebody would use the Haaland thing. When we were linked with Kane, I said I’d prefer Haaland.
I suspect the club were working on Haaland when we were willing to go to £100m for Kane, though, which is interesting given Pep would’ve had both.
Proper piss boiling.
OntarioBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 14,108
Would it ? If nobody was prepared to pay the release clause it probably indicates that the Clubs that can afford him a) don’t want him or b) don’t think he’s worth £100m.It would be over the £100m and Bruno G isn't worth that. Besides that he has a new home in the North-east that is an indication of a player not wanting to leave.
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
Now that’s something we can probably all agree on.No problem, I guess time will tell .
Although I’m sure many will then disagree on the reasoning behind whatever transpires.
WestGorton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,089
Good player but not needed at the moment.
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Hope this doesn’t drag on all transfer window if we are in for him,as if it falls through I don’t want us leaving it late for alternative targets and miss out ..
mac
Well-Known Member
Is he all that. I haven’t seen anything that really exciting about him ,not for the price.
Sheikh rattle and roll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,532
What a shame palI really appreciate anyone who enjoyed the information I gave. However I will not continue to post ‘what I’ve been told’ here anymore. The vultures await in the shadows for some wrong information.
I really appreciate yours and everyone else’s support over the time I have posted the information given to me.
I will only comment on some of the information I have already given for this season.
Once again thanks.
Thanks for info you’ve posted in the past
Why would he find a new place if he was on the move?Would it ? If nobody was prepared to pay the release clause it probably indicates that the Clubs that can afford him a) don’t want him or b) don’t think he’s worth £100m.