City Matters thread

Cellarite said:
Yeah - we paid £120 at the start of the season for the flexi-gold. Then it's £32.50 for each ticket where we sit. Obviously if we only go to one match, it'll cost us £152.50, but the more we go to, the more of the initial £120 we "earn" back. It suits me and my lad as we live a couple of hours away from Manchester so can't always make it. We've waited a while to qualify and then wouldn't you know, first game of the season (Tottenham), he was at Leeds Festival and I was at a wedding I couldn't get out of.
Click to expand...
Sods law going on there mate. Thanks for your detailed response.
 
Eric Hitchmough said:
Got a horrible feeling Khaldoon, Soriano and co won’t raise an eyebrow until something catastrophic happens, which may well be the case when Galatasaray rock up.
Click to expand...
The club have a choice , pull sales from 3rd party sites who they partner with but implement no sales criteria and therefore actively take action to ensure fans safety , or allow sales with no criteria, increase profit but put fans at risk , which course of action do you think they will take?
 
So sad to see all these comments on multiple threads about how the club is treating the fans, so sad to see loads of empty seats at the stadium. So sad to see that you can't even get a response from the club.

The only thing that the club will see is demonstrations, like what happened last season.

City Matters needs to call an EGM where you tell the club.

The whole ticketing issue is affecting the club so much, there needs to be a hard reset. There needs to be a hard reset on the North Stand, and postpone the opening of the new North Stand until they give the fans the BLUE WALL, an atmospheric home end with the only corporate section in the North Stand being the Sky Bar
 
uwerosler28 said:
The only way the club can ensure only home fans are in the home areas of the stadium would be to operate a policy that tickets can only be sold by them so they can enforce the criteria of prior match attendance being needed. If they allow the 3rd party sites they partner with to sell tickets with no criteria then it will be bedlam and an unsafe atmosphere. There is 100% a decision to be made here over fan safety v profit , sadly I know which side the club will choose. They will put home fans at risk by allowing their partner ticketing sites to sell tickets to anyone with no criteria so long as they are able to pay the inflated price on the relevant website. Can city matters flag this concern now and ensure us fans concerns are aired , if the club then choose to ignore that then whatever happens next is on them
Click to expand...
Gala have huge numbers of fans based in the UK and the Manchester area. I know some who also follow City. They say that most Gala fans hate United and LFC but like City after Istanbul so hopefully it won’t kick off. The only major trouble we have had was with Celtic but they behaved like animals. Poznan fans were everywhere but they get on well with City so there was no trouble. They have a fierce reputation in Poland though. Let’s hope the Gala match is a dead rubber as well.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Gala have huge numbers of fans based in the UK and the Manchester area. I know some who also follow City. They say that most Gala fans hate United and LFC but like City after Istanbul so hopefully it won’t kick off. The only major trouble we have had was with Celtic but they behaved like animals. Poznan fans were everywhere but they get on well with City so there was no trouble. They have a fierce reputation in Poland though. Let’s hope the Gala match is a dead rubber as well.
Click to expand...
Pep went out of his way last week to makesure it won't be.
 
Gala will be a tough sell no matter what, but I don’t see how the club get this right. To avoid the risk of half the seats being empty, you’d think they’d require some sort of previous purchase history. But knowing the club, it’ll probably end up on general sale, which could easily lead to trouble.
 
Ryan Kinlon said:
Gala will be a tough sell no matter what, but I don’t see how the club get this right. To avoid the risk of half the seats being empty, you’d think they’d require some sort of previous purchase history. But knowing the club, it’ll probably end up on general sale, which could easily lead to trouble.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter if the club impose previous history or not on their selling rules , so long as they still release 1000's of tickets to their partner ticket selling sites who don't operate any criteria it will be irrelevant whatever they try and impose.
 
uwerosler28 said:
It doesn't matter if the club impose previous history or not on their selling rules , so long as they still release 1000's of tickets to their partner ticket selling sites who don't operate any criteria it will be irrelevant whatever they try and impose.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. There were no Leeds fans in home areas on Saturday, we're there?
Or did I get that wrong?
 
Thank God we’ve got independent fans groups that refuse to suck up to the club, and will fight for the fans. Even City Matters are onboard now, which will be a concern for the club.

IMG_6653.jpeg
 
Ryan Kinlon said:
Gala will be a tough sell no matter what, but I don’t see how the club get this right. To avoid the risk of half the seats being empty, you’d think they’d require some sort of previous purchase history. But knowing the club, it’ll probably end up on general sale, which could easily lead to trouble.
Click to expand...
As above, having ticket restrictions makes no difference at all. The amount of tickets on third party sites mean previous purchasing history is irrelavant
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top