Just made a big mistake, reading the Mail's write-up if the game (it's my parents' paper, I promise)....complete and utter tosh! Utd this, Mourinho that, Rashford the other. Oh, and City played better. Then made a bigger mistake - moved onto the Express write-up (also not my paper!). The most laughable pile of guff I have ever seen. In their player marking, they actually make the rags the better team. And the headline: "Ten-man reds can hold heads up". WT actual F.
Both papers seem to blame Aguero for getting headbutted too, which is just bizarre seeing as the press hounded the FA to ban the same player as a despicable thug after the 1st league derby when something far less aggressive took place.
It's a common theme everywhere, TV, pundits, newspaper, the whole lot. The day will come when City truly dominate and they will moan till kingdom come. That will be satisfaction for me. I don't think I've read unbiased news for years. Why I don't read any. I just look at comments on online newspapers for the laughs.
Even Henry was asking in the sky Studio, how Sergio hadn't ever been in the PFA team of the year. I don't believe that you have to had played football to be an expert on football.There are managers that weren't footballers. It's a complete joke what 'pundits' and newspapers spout. I love the game for what it is, and brings. Entertainment, skills, tactics, joy, sadness, joy, controversy. I'll ignore all the bollocks being spouted about the game by so called experts.