Community Shield - Arsenal (N) | Sun 6th Aug - 16:00

Result Prediction


  • Total voters
    183
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry Paul but i wont be watching this friendly on tv. i have no bt sport, sky or other paid channels and never will. As far as going against my wishes, nobody wanted to go against the third reich and risk their lives, but they did because it was the right thing to do.
So now, any City supporters going to the match are comparable with nazi sympathisers...
What a load of sanctimonious bullshit.
 
Sorry Paul but i wont be watching this friendly on tv. i have no bt sport, sky or other paid channels and never will. As far as going against my wishes, nobody wanted to go against the third reich and risk their lives, but they did because it was the right thing to do.
F-ck me I am being compared to a Nazi for taking my grandson to watch our Man City live at Wembley stadium.
Nothing surprises me anymore with people who can't accept a different opinion than theirs. CTID
 
So now, any City supporters going to the match are comparable with nazi sympathisers...
What a load of sanctimonious bullshit.
2+2=5. I was merely stating that sometimes you have to do something you'd rather not, to get an outcome that is better for all. But you probably fucking knew that.
 
F-ck me I am being compared to a Nazi for taking my grandson to watch our Man City live at Wembley stadium.
Nothing surprises me anymore with people who can't accept a different opinion than theirs. CTID
same reply as to the other one.
 
I'm sure there will be enough empty seats for it to look like a boycott anyway. As it happens, I am actually going to this as it's an opportunity to take my sister, niece and nephew to Wembley when they wouldn't normally be able to. The availability of tickets and lower tickets costs are the major reasons for this.
We had already arranged to go before a boycott was announced and I'm not letting them kids down now.
After going to the FA cup final and Istanbul this year I could have quite happily missed this one but it's for the kids, it's a dream for them.

I'm well behind the boycott and wish it had come at a time where I could have joined it. If It wasn't for the kids I would have been watching it at 1894 group screening.
 
2+2=5. I was merely stating that sometimes you have to do something you'd rather not, to get an outcome that is better for all. But you probably fucking knew that.
And yet, out of all the times through out human history that people have made a stand for a common good, when looking for a comparison to a protest about the inconvenience of a lateish kick-off of a football match, your weird little mind immediately turns to nazis...Godwin's Law in real life, folks.
 
Club should just stick the lot on open sale from day one and no restriction, allow all the new fans a chance to go along, it’s not going to stop anyone getting a ticket
I think the club will be trying to decide how many blocks to commit to, bearing in mind the majority of blues that have been asked, have said "poke it!". Even the United Charity Shield game in 2011 had a 5th tier block unsold, and that was when Wembley was a novelty. Every Wembley shield game since, we have been 3k-10k unsold! Frankly I cannot see there being more than 15K blues in total at this one, and frankly that's 15K too many bearing in mind what we are trying to achieve in this boycott.
 
I think the club will be trying to decide how many blocks to commit to, bearing in mind the majority of blues that have been asked, have said "poke it!". Even the United Charity Shield game in 2011 had a 5th tier block unsold, and that was when Wembley was a novelty. Every Wembley shield game since, we have been 3k-10k unsold! Frankly I cannot see there being more than 15K blues in total at this one, and frankly that's 15K too many bearing in mind what we are trying to achieve in this boycott.
Who’s we, was there a vote. I know a boycott was suggested for a 5.00kick off.As far as I know the 4.00 satisfied a fair few. Since then some will still be unhappy and personally ‘boycott’ it, as they have every right.Some won’t.
Not for you to say whether they should or shouldn’t go, whoever you are.
 
I think the club will be trying to decide how many blocks to commit to, bearing in mind the majority of blues that have been asked, have said "poke it!". Even the United Charity Shield game in 2011 had a 5th tier block unsold, and that was when Wembley was a novelty. Every Wembley shield game since, we have been 3k-10k unsold! Frankly I cannot see there being more than 15K blues in total at this one, and frankly that's 15K too many bearing in mind what we are trying to achieve in this boycott.
I see the poster above beat me to it, who is this we?
 
Who’s we, was there a vote. I know a boycott was suggested for a 5.00kick off.As far as I know the 4.00 satisfied a fair few. Since then some will still be unhappy and personally ‘boycott’ it, as they have every right.Some won’t.
Not for you to say whether they should or shouldn’t go, whoever you are.

I see the poster above beat me to it, who is this we?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230707_090650_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230707_090650_Chrome.jpg
    122.2 KB · Views: 30
That was a poll seeking to judge support for a boycott of the 17:30 kick-off. 'We' doesn't include the people who have said they won't boycott 16:00. Got any figures for that?
Have you?

Also have you not read the updated statement by the 1894 group? If you want to go, that's your choice, however if we don't start taking collective stands against such decisions then choice will fast become a thing of the past!
 
Ah so it’s the 725 that voted on bluemoon ( match going fans who knows or not going anyway who knows) have you checked back since the time change. Hardly a mandate for all 50/60000 fans that go to games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top