daveiw01
Well-Known Member
Oh, so it's not still in trials then?This is utter bollox. Most drugs are still in clinical trials, even when approved for many years.
Oh, so it's not still in trials then?This is utter bollox. Most drugs are still in clinical trials, even when approved for many years.
they are entitled to their choices where their bodies are concerned
One of the problems with this statement is that, as you will know, vaccinated people are still infectious.The fact that most have also refused to ware masks when mandated says it all about their selfish nature.
Bottom line: The "Right to life" trumps the "Right to infect anyone I meet"
Oh, so it's not still in trials then?
It's not and I declare my guesses as guesses and don't pretend them to bed the truth like you.Sorry, but your 'guess' is ridiculous, especially given that you went on about what iffery a few posts up.
It's very very different to smoking ffs. I will ask again, still haven't had a genuine, reasoned answer from anyone as yet, though I suspect you'll just dismiss it as 'bollox'...Sure, and other people are entitled to point out that those choices are selfish, and to impose restrictions on them to limit the dangers their selfish choices have on others.
Just like you're not allowed to smoke in confined public spaces because it endangers others.
Truth? I suggest you re-read my post, I asked a question.It's not and I declare my guesses as guesses and don't pretend them to bed the truth like you.
In fact, there are only few better researched medicines/vaccines in the world currently. It is safe and it's working. Deal with it.
A lot of people would die of COVID, if not for the measures to control the virus.
You want your position to be perceived equally in the discussion but are ignoring reality and facts. It's an imposition for the educated and facts orientated majority of the people who yet again face another harsh winter COVID season because of reality ignoring freaks.
Bottom line: we probably have no other tool to discharge the NHS permanently then to make the vaccine obligatory.
Not a particularly persuasive argument when the vaccinated can catch and spread covid and many of the health care workers have natural immunity from previously having covid. It could also be that losing ten of thousands of highly trained professionals will ultimately be much more dangerous to public health than retaining their services and introducing a daily testing regime instead.Whilst I agree it is a person's choice to have or not have a vaccine. Someone who doesn't have it during a pandemic must accept that restrictions will have to apply to their lives till at least the end of the pandemic. Working in heath and care facilities for example.
The fact that most have also refused to ware masks when mandated says it all about their selfish nature.
Bottom line: The "Right to life" trumps the "Right to infect anyone I meet"
No problem at all.One of the problems with this statement is that, as you will know, vaccinated people are still infectious.
If we later learn that the vaccines cause serious problems in the medium to long term, how would *you* then feel given youre one of the people willing to force others to take them?
Try reading what I wrote.
@Octavian have you a much more chunkier explanation earlier, but you paid no attention to that either.
So is allowing the voluntary unvaccinated to fill up the hospital beds and take resources away from others. It's a difficult situation but in this particular case I'd be tempted to follow Austria's route.
If we later learn that the vaccines cause serious problems in the medium to long term, how would *you* then feel given youre one of the people willing to force others to take them?
Misinformation, I assume? As it stands very few people die of covid19, having contracted it, I'm aware that any death is too many, but one way or another we will all die, eventually.Since loaded questions is the order of the day, how do you feel having deaths on your hands caused by the misunderstood you're spreading?
I'm not advocating forcing anyone, I'm saying that choices have consequences.
Really think if you are unvaccinated and end up in hospital with covid, you should be charged for treatment.![]()
ICU is full of the unvaccinated – my patience with them is wearing thin | Anonymous
Most of the resources we are devoting to Covid in hospital are being spent on people who have not had jab, says an NHS consultantwww.theguardian.com
Realise it’s from The Guardian but worth a read. I think it contains some interesting stuff
Depends what your definition of very few is, I guess you must be one of the lucky few that have not has any deaths in your family or circle of friends / neighbours.Misinformation, I assume? As it stands very few people die of covid19, having contracted it, I'm aware that any death is too many, but one way or another we will all die, eventually.
Anyway, I'm out of here, good day.
Will that principle be applied to smokers, fat bastards with heart problems etc?Really think if you are unvaccinated and end up in hospital with covid, you should be charged for treatment.
Thank you for taking the time to post a detailed, reasoned reply, for the most part.
I still strongly disagree with the 'selfish' part, they are entitled to their choices where their bodies are concerned and that is not up for debate in my book, nor should it ever be, in a civilised society.
We're taking the first steps down a very slippery slope.