CSKA Post Match Thread

lancs blue said:
blueinsa said:
Chippy_boy said:
I was so fuming mad last night and like others probably said some things I shouldn't have.

But honestly all this blaming the ref is just rubbish. We started the game with the single objective of coming away with a win, no matter how, no matter what happens, only a win. And we failed. It's really as simple as that.

Ask yourself, would Chelsea have come away with a win? You know they would. So blaming the ref is a lame excuse. Really lame.

The thing that makes this slip up so acutely painful is that it's exactly the same shit they we keep churning out. Real Madrid away, Bayern away this season, Sporting away, Napoli away etc etc etc. We've seen it all so many times before and nothing seems to change.

A win, no matter how, only a win and we would have got it if not for the corrupt ref.

You can not account for a corrupt ref!
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Not so much the formation, although I still believe even Glenn Hoddle has it right when it comes to an extra man in midfield at this level, some players need to tweak their playing style.

In particular, Vinny, who might as well start now as he starts to get older.

He doesn't have to win every ball, he doesn't need to show that he has the ability to play his way out of trouble.

All he needs to do is take a couple of steps back in Europe and give himself a little more time.

A bit like the shambles which was the Brazil World Cup midfield, it can make top players look like clowns if you don't have the right balance.


Nice post.
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
willipp said:
blueinsa said:
A win, no matter how, only a win and we would have got it if not for the corrupt ref.

You can not account for a corrupt ref!

We'd of won if Yaya hadnt done a stupid flick on the edge of the box, we'd of won if Milner had scored into an almost empty net. To blame the ref just deflects from the real problem last night, and that was the manager and the players, not the ref. Even if the ref hadnt given that penalty, all that does is cover the cracks of how we perform in Europe. Simple facts are that we arent good enough in Europe.


Toure did exactly the same thing at Hull. He was caught deep trying to play a stupid pass and the ball came right back in which led to the penalty.

We suffer more than most I think from individual mistakes. One mistake and we concede!

I just wonder whether the ref is desperately looking for a pen in the last ten minutes. Well, he fucking found one last night!
 
Mister Appointment said:
Never seen so many people so quick to throw their own club/players/staff under the bus whilst ignoring the OBVIOUS reason we lost.

They scored a goal from a penalty that never was. In the last five minutes. This more than anything else on the night dictated the result.

Matty got you started with his "was the only reason we ended up losing" comment, didn't he.

I think we drew mate.
 
Matty said:
lancs blue said:
blueinsa said:
A win, no matter how, only a win and we would have got it if not for the corrupt ref.

You can not account for a corrupt ref!
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Surely if the officials were corrupt, then they would have given the marginal offside as offside. They didn't. Made mistakes yes but corrupt no.
 
Chippy_boy said:
Mister Appointment said:
Never seen so many people so quick to throw their own club/players/staff under the bus whilst ignoring the OBVIOUS reason we lost.

They scored a goal from a penalty that never was. In the last five minutes. This more than anything else on the night dictated the result.

Matty got you started with his "was the only reason we ended up losing" comment, didn't he.

I think we drew mate.

True, but lets face it, it feels like we lost doesn't it! 2-0 up and coasting, 2-2 at full time, largely down to a late, terrible, refereeing decision.
 
KnaresboroughBlue said:
Matty said:
lancs blue said:
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Surely if the officials were corrupt, then they would have given the marginal offside as offside. They didn't. Made mistakes yes but corrupt no.

That's why I said it was more likely he was shite.
 
Matty said:
lancs blue said:
blueinsa said:
A win, no matter how, only a win and we would have got it if not for the corrupt ref.

You can not account for a corrupt ref!
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.
 
lancs blue said:
Matty said:
lancs blue said:
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.

Don't tell me what I would or wouldn't have done.

If the offside decision had gone against us I'd have been annoyed but, ultimately, he was extremely marginally offside so can't really argue with it. If it had been a CSKA goal, and it had been allowed to stand I'd have been even more annoyed, as he's offside, but again, it's so close it's one of those calls you can understand the official not getting right.

The piss poor performance of City's team was a major contributing factor into the fact we threw away a 2-0 lead. However, despite City being really, really, poor, we were 2-1 up, with less than 5 minutes left, and with Hart not really having had too many saves to make. If CSKA don;t get that awful penalty decision then they only have 4 minutes, plus 3 added on, to score an equaliser. They possibly could have got it, but the safe money would have been on it finishing 2-1 to City. We shouldnb't have gotten ourselves into a position where the result could be swung by a terrible piece of refereeing but don't let that change the fact that the result was indeed swung on a terrible piece of refereeing and not on the performance of City. Our performance set up the situation, but didn't actually cause it.
 
lancs blue said:
Matty said:
lancs blue said:
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.

So we have to be winning every game by at least 2 goals now every week just in case we get a ref mistake?

It's up to us to counter shit corrupt refs, rather than expect them to do their jobs in a professional manner with some moral integrity?

Never heard so much bollox in my life!
 
lancs blue said:
Matty said:
lancs blue said:
If you insist in piling all the blame on the officials rather than the players you should at least point out that we wouldn't even have got a point last night but for that "corrupt" assistant failing to flag Zab offisde for the second goal.
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.

I agree mate. The only thing I would add is, we weren't brilliant in the first half. They sat back and allowed us to dominate, but every time they attacked we looked wobbly. And the number of times we failed to make simple passes was just dreadful, first and second halves. Other than his through ball to Dzeko, Silva was dreadful by his usual magnificent standards, and that general sub-standard performance was echoed right across the team. Just really really poor.
 
blueinsa said:
lancs blue said:
Matty said:
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.

So we have to be winning every game by at least 2 goals now every week just in case we get a ref mistake?

It's up to us to counter shit corrupt refs, rather than expect them to do their jobs in a professional manner with some moral integrity?

Never heard so much bollox in my life!

Nor have I. Get a grip man FFS with this corrupt refs shite. You're embarrassing yourself.
 
The worst thing about last nights result is that it has completely taken all the optimism of the fans away. The CSKA and Bayern games at the Etihad will not sell out and the atmosphere will be shocking. The Roma home game was one of the worst match day experiences I've ever had, 37,000 tickets sold is that a joke? We had better support in Europa League. Seriously considering not going to the home game against CSKA, the Etihad is my second home but on champions league nights I don't feel at home. Half the sodding time you are surrounded by away fans anyway. The guy sat next to me was wearing a Roma shirt and the stewards did nothing. When we trialled the singing section against Bayern and Villarreal that was borderline pathetic, we were quieter ffs! 37,000 sold for Roma, was it a capital one cup game or what? I'd actually take europa league now because at least we would have a chance of winning it. I hate CL nights at the etihad and last nights game has just set up CSKA and Bayern to be a Highbury Library. Fucking snoresville. And you know what the worst thing about it is!!!!!! I'm citys little bitch, no matter how much they hurt me I'll go back. 4 years of disaster in the CL it's a fucking joke!!!!!!! I am a little bitch... woohoo cheers i hate my life.... cheers Doumbia mate I'll see you at the Etihad because I know ill always come back to you. Tottttiiiiiiiiii the 38 year old zimmerframe man..... 1-1!!!!! Yeehaaa another 9-5pm day I've worked and City screw me over again.
 
blueinsa said:
lancs blue said:
Matty said:
That's disingenuous. Zaba's offside was borderline, very difficult to see, a perfectly acceptable call to not flag as it was only after slow motion replays you could see he was a couple of inches offside. The penalty decisions, both the one not given and the one given, were clear as day, and the referee got them both horribly wrong. So, he's either corrupt or, as is more likely, he's shite and shouldn't be refereeing at that level. I mean, lets face it, how many high profile games does he get in the Hungarian league?!

Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.

So we have to be winning every game by at least 2 goals now every week just in case we get a ref mistake?

It's up to us to counter shit corrupt refs, rather than expect them to do their jobs in a professional manner with some moral integrity?

Never heard so much bollox in my life!

Stop twisting my words - in the context of last night, yes we should have been out of sight when the penalty was awarded. That we weren't was entirely down to a shit 2nd half performance. We didn't even need to be on top form in the 2nd half, even an average performance would have been enough. Fuck knows I've seen plenty of shit from City over the years but I'm still fuming this morning about that 2nd half.
 
lancs blue said:
blueinsa said:
lancs blue said:
Yet if that offside decision had gone against us like the pens you and others would be lumping it in as more evidence of corruption.

Why can't some of you get to grips with the fact that we didn't win because of a piss poor 2nd half performance by the players and the manager, the late penalty should only have affected our goal difference, nothing else.

So we have to be winning every game by at least 2 goals now every week just in case we get a ref mistake?

It's up to us to counter shit corrupt refs, rather than expect them to do their jobs in a professional manner with some moral integrity?

Never heard so much bollox in my life!

Stop twisting my words - in the context of last night, yes we should have been out of sight when the penalty was awarded. That we weren't was entirely down to a shit 2nd half performance. We didn't even need to be on top form in the 2nd half, even an average performance would have been enough. Fuck knows I've seen plenty of shit from City over the years but I'm still fuming this morning about that 2nd half.

That shit performance and it was shit, let's make no mistake was GOOD enough and it took a bent ref to give them something out of the game.
 
There's all sorts of reasons we didn't get the 3 points last night. The ref was certainly one but we should never have been in a position, when 2-0 up and coasting, to have been hanging on in the last few minutes. It's like that childrens' song about the dog chasing the cat that caught the mouse that ate the cheese...

The ref was able to give the decision because we stupidly gave away possession in a dangerous position, when there was no need to. If we learn to hang onto the ball and see games out then there's no problem. When we gave away possession the full back was way up the field beyond the midfield. If he'd been back then the consequences might not have been so bad. The full-back was up the field because we were far too gung-ho when all we needed to do was be a little cautious & hang on for the win. We were too gung-ho because that's the way our manager plays and doesn't believe in changing the system to suit the situation. Knowing that we are looking a bit vulnerable at the back, he should have kept control of the game after half-time and made it difficult for CSKA to play in that area in front of the defence. If Mark Hughes can do it with the players he has at Stoke then I'm sure we can when absolutely necessary.

I was a bit nervous when I saw we were going 4-4-2 last night but he had ot take a bit of a risk to get the start we got. Having got that start, to allow us to throw it away was criminal. Yes the ref played a part, as did the lack of a crowd and the temperature probably. But as we showed in 2011/2012, we have the ability to make shit refereeing less of a factor.
 
Bayern were shit against CSKA as well, the only difference being that they were given a penalty when they deserved one and weren't given one against them unjustly. Had they received the decisions we did, they would of lost that game 1-0. In any game that is a draw or a one goal win, the referee has the power to completely decide the game, which he did last night.

How many times have we seen the rags play shit but get away with it due to dodgy refereeing in their favour? I don't want dodgy decisions bailing us out, but it's not remotely unreasonable to expect fair refereeing to not hammer us every time we have a close game.
 
I keep hearing this, "we should never have been in this position" shit.

What position is that? Winning a game away in the CL 2-1 despite playing shit?

Honestly will some of you listen to yourselves!

We were fucking robbed yet again.
 
Well it's the morning after the night before and I still can't believe how shit we were in the 2nd half compared with the first. The change was so startling that one does actually have to wonder if Pellers and/or the players threw the game with the ref helping out at the death just to make sure.
It they didn't throw it - which I refuse to believe - then It is becoming quite clear that Mancini was right about the attitude of certain players. He couldn't get them moving the season after winning the Premier League and it's looking very much the same for Pellers this season. I'd love to be proved wrong but half our players look like they are either:
[a] Still on their holidays; or
Couldn't give a shit.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top