Dangerous Dogs

I'm With Stupid said:
Well yeah, but equally what better way to make your point? Unless they're not so confident that they're as nice as they claim?
Click to expand...
I am not a bully fan in any shape or form but get a large number of dogs together and the potential for a bit of boisterous behaviour is there.
 
Couldn't the XL Bully people be forced to go live in special areas called Bully-tustans. Maybe some where like Hull.

That rabble of oddballs look like the kind of people that sensible decent folk go out of their way to avoid.
 
Citizen of Legoland said:
You can’t judge a dog like the XL Bully as innocent in the same way as a human. Unfortunately they don’t seem to start off with petty crime and work up to deadly mauling behaviour, they go straight to the full blown attack. They should be muzzled and kept on leads in public areas.
Click to expand...
What I can't get my head around is why any sane person would want a dog that has the potential to seriously harm or worse kill someone. And that's the issue for me potential, no matter how soft an owner may say their dog is the potential is always there.
 
havefaith said:
What I can't get my head around is why any sane person would want a dog that has the potential to seriously harm or worse kill someone. And that's the issue for me potential, no matter how soft an owner may say their dog is the potential is always there.
Click to expand...

They aren't sane. They are educationally subnormal knuckle-draggers. They don't have their dogs to enjoy them as pets (e.g on woodland walks) they are either a toy or a fashion accessory.

Most of these people grew up on sink estates being fed only on Iceland/farmfoods and smacked about by their alcoholic stepdad. It's like in H.G Wells The Time Machine, they're almost a different species. They have gone through evolutionary divergence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top