salford blue 62
Well-Known Member
Re: Silva - best since Bell?
jimharri 78-85 were my lost years beer wise i mean
jimharri 78-85 were my lost years beer wise i mean
Blue Til Death said:When making comparisons with the greatest City player of all time bar none, you need to take into account the conditions the players were confronted with week in week out, Silva is a genius on the surfaces of the modern game and to be fair its hard to find a better player in his position today but if Colin Bell had played on the same surfaces, instead of the quagmires and swamps he played on virtually every week, we would not be having this conversation. Like for like with the same conditions there is only one answer.. Colin Bell (Nijinsky) The King, The Leader of Manchester City & The Greatest..!!
rick773 said:Blue Til Death said:When making comparisons with the greatest City player of all time bar none, you need to take into account the conditions the players were confronted with week in week out, Silva is a genius on the surfaces of the modern game and to be fair its hard to find a better player in his position today but if Colin Bell had played on the same surfaces, instead of the quagmires and swamps he played on virtually every week, we would not be having this conversation. Like for like with the same conditions there is only one answer.. Colin Bell (Nijinsky) The King, The Leader of Manchester City & The Greatest..!!
Wouldn't the level of opponent also come in then? I'm not saying one is better than the other but at the very least the overall quality of player increase would even out the differences in playing surface.
I wouldn't swap silva for anyone in the world though. Not sure I can say that about anyone else on the team.
oakiecokie said:rick773 said:Blue Til Death said:When making comparisons with the greatest City player of all time bar none, you need to take into account the conditions the players were confronted with week in week out, Silva is a genius on the surfaces of the modern game and to be fair its hard to find a better player in his position today but if Colin Bell had played on the same surfaces, instead of the quagmires and swamps he played on virtually every week, we would not be having this conversation. Like for like with the same conditions there is only one answer.. Colin Bell (Nijinsky) The King, The Leader of Manchester City & The Greatest..!!
Wouldn't the level of opponent also come in then? I'm not saying one is better than the other but at the very least the overall quality of player increase would even out the differences in playing surface.
I wouldn't swap silva for anyone in the world though. Not sure I can say that about anyone else on the team.
What !! Not even Sergio ???
tolmie's hairdoo said:I have seen numerous threads in the past talking about where the likes of Yaya and Aguero stand in terms of greatness, alongside Bell and such, all more than valid.
I would just like to state in my 30 years of watching City, I have never seen a player as good as David Silva.
I've have heard all the pros and cons, he doesn't score enough goals etc.
His performance against Barcelona the other night was the greatest, most technically perfect performance I have seen from anyone in a City shirt.
His passing, his control under pressure, his ability to take the likes of Xavi and Iniesta out of the play with a turn of his body - absolutely majestic.
At Bayern, earlier this season and twice against Madrid, he was also the stand-out player on the pitch.
Bell was before my time, but up there with the King?
jollylescott said:Greatness comes in many different forms. It can present itself in the highest achievement in, for example, the arts, the sciences and sport. Usually those that possess these rare qualities are born with these skills.
In my view David Silva is a true artist at work. Like Picasso he can make something out of nothing.
There is an extraordinary vision which presents as an unerring sixth sense as to where to best position himself, in relation to those around him.
There is the magical touch which transcends any that I have seen before. As Pellegrini said, he has never seen a better player of the final ball than Merlin.
There is the ability to retain the ball in the most difficult of circumstances. As Fred Eyre said during the Norwich commentary, Silva could find space in a single bed with Dawn French and Hattie Jacques. I well recall a moment in the 6-1 at the swamp. It was the first half and he was on the edge of their box. He wriggled, swerved and struggled through about 5 of them in a space of no more than about 5 square yards, and still came out with the ball. How he did that I will never know.
There is the toughness. This is a most underestimated quality that he possesses. He is small in stature but large in heart.
In addition he is modest to a fault. When he does eventually retire he will quietly return to Gran Canaria and resume his unassuming life. He is never one to seek the limelight. I notice this even on this Forum, where I have on occasion gone back 4 or 5 pages to find any comment on Merlin, whereas other players seem to occupy our minds constantly.
In the meantime we are privileged to witness every week an artist at work.
It is well nigh impossible to compare greatness in different generations. King Colin is the King for a reason. He was the greatest of his generation.
But if Colin is the King then David Silva is entitled to sit beside the throne in a place of honour.
Not bad we got Silva and Yaya for pretty much the same transfer fee the Arse paid for Ozil.malg said:I reckon Yaya has plenty of technical ability and vision, however for me Silva just appears more 'silky/sublime/effortless'- don't know how else to say it.Danamy said:It's a real pub type debate this one and it'll all come down to your age or how you like the game to be played?
I'm not old enough to remember Bell but i respect those that say how good he was at that period in our history.
If you like power and brute strength then Yaya is your man
If you like pace and finishing then Sergio is your man
but
If you like technical ability, finesse and vision then Silva is your man (i fall in to this category)
I want him to have the ball all the time because i love watching him play the game, it's the only way i can put in to words how good i think he is.
He reminds me of a small Zidane at times the way his feet caresses the ball and then he does that reverse inside ball, most people know it's coming but still fail to stop it.
Class player and long may he continue to wear our shirt
Not bad for £24m.
r.soleofsalford said:two completely different types of player colin bell was more in the gerrard style but imo better.
i`ve never seen a player able to receive a ball at any speed and have it immediately under control, brilliant at passing, dribbling and making space for himself and team mates
A myth I wouldn't have minded in the team, Gerrard is and has been a great player.johnnytapia said:r.soleofsalford said:two completely different types of player colin bell was more in the gerrard style but imo better.
i`ve never seen a player able to receive a ball at any speed and have it immediately under control, brilliant at passing, dribbling and making space for himself and team mates
Using Gerrard as a reference point for Bell is tantamount to treason. Gerrard is a fucking myth, built up by the press to be some kind of midfield giant - he ain't and never has been. Bell was immense, a colossus, someone who bestrode the pitch and annihilated everyone and everything before him. Watch him celebrate a goal - he doesn't - no need for him to get all "showy", arms splayed, knees sliding, kissing the camera bollocks - he did the speaking with his feet.
Bluebee2 said:A myth I wouldn't have minded in the team, Gerrard is and has been a great player.johnnytapia said:r.soleofsalford said:two completely different types of player colin bell was more in the gerrard style but imo better.
i`ve never seen a player able to receive a ball at any speed and have it immediately under control, brilliant at passing, dribbling and making space for himself and team mates
Using Gerrard as a reference point for Bell is tantamount to treason. Gerrard is a fucking myth, built up by the press to be some kind of midfield giant - he ain't and never has been. Bell was immense, a colossus, someone who bestrode the pitch and annihilated everyone and everything before him. Watch him celebrate a goal - he doesn't - no need for him to get all "showy", arms splayed, knees sliding, kissing the camera bollocks - he did the speaking with his feet.
Great Teams win leagues.johnnytapia said:Bluebee2 said:A myth I wouldn't have minded in the team, Gerrard is and has been a great player.johnnytapia said:Using Gerrard as a reference point for Bell is tantamount to treason. Gerrard is a fucking myth, built up by the press to be some kind of midfield giant - he ain't and never has been. Bell was immense, a colossus, someone who bestrode the pitch and annihilated everyone and everything before him. Watch him celebrate a goal - he doesn't - no need for him to get all "showy", arms splayed, knees sliding, kissing the camera bollocks - he did the speaking with his feet.
Sorry Bluebee we'll have to agree to differ. By my understanding of "great" Gerrard fails. By a country mile. And more. Big fish in a small pond, happy to take all the scouse adulation and knowing he'll be eulogised by their press. But, when looked at in greater scrutiny, he just isn't "great". Greatness wins leagues.