cleavers
Moderator
I think you missed my point completely, yes it was sarcastically put, but as I listed below none of those games had "weakened" teams out, ie rotated teams.Chippy_boy said:cleavers said:Just think where we would be now if we'd won all 34 games so far !Chippy_boy said:Just think where we would be now if we had won at for example Cardiff, Sunderland, Villa etc.
Teams lose games, even the best teams.
Congratulations on the most insightful post of the day.
There's losing games and there's needlessly fucking things up. There is a difference.
They were all "weakened" by injuries (only slightly in 2 cases), and the reasons for the defeats were invariable bad defending/individual cock ups, as could have happened in any of the other 34 games we've played, and it happens to all teams at some point, its one of those if my granny had balls statements.
Have we had too many this season ? possibly, but 2 of those 3 games, were at a time when the whole team were adjusting to a new way of playing, a better way, as the run following the Sunderland game showed, and even despite injuries, the new way of playing generally worked.
Collectively over the season, we are likely to come up just short, but this is as much down to losing twice to Chelsea, and losing to Liverpool away, as it is Cardiff, Villa, and Sunderland defeats, and in all three of those games had we taken our chances up front, we'd have won.