Matty
Well-Known Member
The question has to be asked, "Why are people nitpicking with regards to Dzeko"? They don't when other players, Garcia and Kolarov being prime examples, have poor games, so why when Dzeko does? I'd postulate that the nitpicking is as a direct result of the vigorous, zealous and overly confrontational defending of Dzeko whenever anyone says something even slightly uncomplimentary about him.adorado30 said:pominoz said:kara54 said:It's not only about opinion. Everyone has his own opinion. You can love this or that player more, hate the other one, and so on.
I love Dzeko and I am happy when he plays well. I also do not have problems when someone thinks Ballo/Aguero/Negredo is better than Dzeko.
(Well imo Aguero for sure is better, and Balo is not, but that's off topic).
But pudge does not skip a single game, without trying to diminish Dzeko's effort.
When Dzeko scored that screamer against Cardiff, he spent 10 pages in this thread, trying to explain everyone how the ball was deflected.
But who cares?!? As a "real City fan" he is supposed to be happy about that goal. Simple.
When Dzeko scores a tap-in, then it was simple, everyone could have done that. But when Negredo does the same, then he is a match winner.
And Dzekos' assist AND goal weighs less than Negredo's tap-in (nothing against Negredo, great player).
Still, he has right on his own opinion. But his opinion does not change, so I don't get why he has to repeat himself week in week out.
Would he be so critical about all other City players like he is about Dzeko, then he would have to spend 100h/day only to write all this stuff.
But who cares. I mostly ignore his posts, because they are far from being objective.
I think Pudge's, and many other poster's problem is that every other City player has been criticised on here at one time or another, but it is only Dzeko that has such a fanatical fan base, that to post that he had a bad game results in the type of shit we have seen in the last 100+ pages. Dzeko had a bad game, "no, you are anti-Bosnian, racist, know fuck all about football, not real City fans", on and on it goes.
No one hates Dzeko on here, but he has more bad games than good, and we should have the right to say so without the bullshit from his fanboys.
Criticizing a player it's all good and deserving and i certainly dont have a problem with that. However, the constant fucking nitpicking that he gets if just beyond warranted. Kara54 certaintly has a valid point with all the nitpicking,and you are one of the loudest on here with your regular bullshit. Against Villa, he scored a goal, and you kept on how the ball went of his shoulder. End of the day he put us in lead @ 2-1 and who fucking cares how he scored the goal and of what body part it bounced. Just to summarize it quickly" His goals are either put on plate on him, scored of deflections or just bounce of his donkey body..
Garcia plays badly, a few people will post highlighting his poor player and having a dig at his abilities as a footballer. Then the matter blows over and we move on. That's the basic timeline of events.
Dzeko plays badly, a few people will post highlighting his poor player and having a dig at his abilities as a footballer. A host of Dzeko fans jump all over the thread, either defending Dzeko without any real substance, pointedly refusing to accept the facts in front of their face, or accusing those who think Dzeko played poorly of having an agenda against him based on him being Bosnian. The matter doesn't blow over as, those who originally posted comments about Dzeko's poor display, take umbrage at the overly robust nature of the responses, and at the complete lack of objectivity, and further posts are made. Suddenly what would have been a handful of posts turns into 10's of pages. Look at yesterdays match as a case in point, Dzeko didn't play very well, that's really pretty indesputable to anyone without an unhealthy level of obsession with Dzeko. He scored and assisted, but his general play wasn't the best. All that merited was a few posts discussing the issue, and then it would have been over. However along came the normal bunch of Dzeko apologists, and the matter escalated. We wouldn't mind of cogent arguments were put forward, examples of how Dzeko's display might have been misinterpreted, etc, but instead all we get are accusations of being haters, of having an agenda against Bosnia etc. I honestly believe that Dzeko could start a game, sit down in the centre circle for 90 minutes refusing to join in and there would be some who would come on here and claim it was Dzeko's right to do so, that it was the fault of City, of the management, of the club as a whole, because they hadn't treated him with respect. I mean, how can he be expected to move around the pitch when he doesn't get to start games very often? It's this kind of biased, blinkered posting that drives the sane amongst us to distraction.
Anyway, I've finished work for the day, and I'm off out tonight, so I'll bid you adieu. No doubt this "debate" will continue in my absence.