crazyg
Well-Known Member
He'd still get a hat trick and run rings round Maguire.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Etihad Campus, Stadium and Collar Site Development Thread
- Thread starter Danamy
- Start date
M
M
manchester blue
Guest
Genuine question. How do you know the majority of City fans want this? I would have thought the most vocal City fans would want to be adjacent to the away fans.Ferran, if you’re reading this thread, can we have a bit more info on the North Stand expansion you said was still going ahead during your interview in Iceland. We’ve been waiting years for a in-depth update.
If you didn’t already know, the vast majority of City fans would like a large single tiered home end/North Stand. If that isn’t possible for whatever reason, a large double tiered home end/North stand would be City fans 2nd choice. TBH there isn’t much support for another 3 tired stand like the South Stand.
Thanks.
I must be the minority as I like the symmetrical look!
I would prefer 3 tiers to one, I'm not sure of any benefit of having it all one tier, it actually makes the fans further away from the pitch and would mean losing the exec boxes.
The goal will be to have all the 2nd tier premium when there is enough demand, they won't build a new stand to lose money.
The goal will be to have all the 2nd tier premium when there is enough demand, they won't build a new stand to lose money.
Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 3,180
Think I’m too mentally scarred from seeing the artists impression of the new Platt Lane / Umbro Stand for the first time to favour a single tier North Stand.
Arguably the height of Swales’ mediocrity.
Arguably the height of Swales’ mediocrity.
You missed the idea of bolting seats to the old kippax as opposed to a new stand. Even though looking back building a new stand for 8 years full use wasn't the greatest outcome.Think I’m too mentally scarred from seeing the artists impression of the new Platt Lane / Umbro Stand for the first time to favour a single tier North Stand.
Arguably the height of Swales’ mediocrity.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
41 minutes you say, I must listen to that.Link to interview is on the bluemoon forum go to 41 minutes and he clearly states about the expansion.
Spurs one tier doesn't work not the unbelievable atmosphere they wanted !I would prefer 3 tiers to one, I'm not sure of any benefit of having it all one tier, it actually makes the fans further away from the pitch and would mean losing the exec boxes.
The goal will be to have all the 2nd tier premium when there is enough demand, they won't build a new stand to lose money.
Was originally meant to be a two tier stand that the govern ment were paying a percentage towards all seated stadiums as usual Swales saw the opportunity to save money and turned into the monstrosity it was!Think I’m too mentally scarred from seeing the artists impression of the new Platt Lane / Umbro Stand for the first time to favour a single tier North Stand.
Arguably the height of Swales’ mediocrity.
More like Swales lunacy more like, whoever signed that off needed help.Think I’m too mentally scarred from seeing the artists impression of the new Platt Lane / Umbro Stand for the first time to favour a single tier North Stand.
Arguably the height of Swales’ mediocrity.
Del_Bosque
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 2,778
Roughly zero chance of a single tiered extension imo.
Have to do away with the corporate that’s there. They will want to add more if anything.
Also just don’t see them moving the family stand at all, too much fucking around last time.
Path of least resistance is adding a 3rd tier.
Have to do away with the corporate that’s there. They will want to add more if anything.
Also just don’t see them moving the family stand at all, too much fucking around last time.
Path of least resistance is adding a 3rd tier.