Harry Kane

Why are folk hell bent on talking about how old he is? he's 28 years old. He's in his prime, he puts the ball in the net - and he's very very good at doing so.

He's got a good 4/5 seasons left at the peak of his powers - if he comes, welcome him and enjoy him.
 
LongsightM13 said:
We are buying a striker. Unless you think the actual chairman of the club is a liar
Click to expand...
Sergio can stay for as long as he wants (as long as we want him to).

Takes full responsibility for Super League when the dust settles after having an underling sign a letter of apology instead.

What next an actual Prime Minsiter of a country lying? They need to be liars to get the job.
 
Bluesince88 said:
It is hot.
The people who don’t want Kane seem to make stuff up, just like your price tag, contract length and then predicting his career with nothing to back it up what so ever. After winning the golden boot and top assister you believe he’s on the decline. I’ve yet to see any logic to people not wanting him, some just dislike him and I’d rather that was said. Aguero was battered with injuries and was here until he was 33. Shearer with an awful injury record retired at 35. Off the back of nothing though Bluemoon thinks that in less than two years he will be done. Love it here.
Click to expand...
It's an opinion. Nobody is stating it as fact. Why would the Premier leagues best striker (I'm assuming you agree) settle for less than a 5 year contract? Also, forever ppl have been saying "English tax" and levy is a genius, stubborn salesman. Now I'm supposed to believe he will let his jewel in the crown go for less than £150m? These are just a guess, an opinion. They seem a realistic guess. As for why ppl think he will decline after 30, they've watched it happen numerous times. Their opinion is they can see a decline like Rooney, Owen, torres, fowler, etc. You can't say yes or no unless you have seen his physio records, but if you think he will, it doesn't make you incorrect until proven otherwise, as with the opposite opinion. Aguero's a one off, a legend!!! Any other player he would of been replaced years ago.

So if asked if I'd prefer mendes, camavinga & isak for the same fee as kane (roughly) I'd jump at it. Its a huge risk over a minor risk. Those 3 players will always pretty much demand the same fee back if struggling due to age. Kane if and I mean if he drops, breaks down is not going to go anywhere on that wage until he's 33.

All opinions and I don't disagree with yours on kane. But I disagree with you jumping down ppls throats calling it "lunacy" when logically your opinion is the highest risk (albeit possibly highest reward).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.