eastlandsblue
Well-Known Member
Underwhelming in the sense he is not Haaland, also let's not forget be seems injury prone and at almost 28 time is precious, and for the fee involved to take him out of that 6 year contract he signed no so long ago, there are some risk involved. Sure he will add goals but so would Haaland. The only big pros I can see with Kane over Haaland is the Delap situation,
Anyway, at the end of the day I would be more than happy with either of them with some preference towards Haaland
Kane is better than Haarland. And at 28 he's still got a good 4 years at the top. By which time, either Delap has proven himself. Or we end up going for a prime Haarland who could also end his career at City. I get Kanes injury issues. But being at City will see him rested more.