Harry Kane

BlueMoonAcrossThePond said:
We have 3 massively talented center backs - DIas is best, Stone's form has improved where he's 2nd choice, but Laporte is on par with Dias and Stones.

Hopefully management will be able to sit down with all 3 and agree with some sort of amenable deal where each player is satisfied.
Click to expand...

We will play lets say 55 games next season - x 2 cenre halfs - thats 110 games - Can we not just say you get 36 each ish?
 
worsleyweb said:
We will play lets say 55 games next season - x 2 cenre halfs - thats 110 games - Can we not just say you get 36 each ish?
Click to expand...
In the best of world's this - or some other compromise - will suffice. The lucky (unfortunate) fact is that we now have 3 of the best center backs in world football in our side - currently DIas and Stones are better than Laporte - but if we can somehow keep all 3 - we'll be much the better.
 
LucahArchie10 said:
Laporte knows hes getting 36-40 matches but he also knows Dias & stones will play in every big game inc champs final & there lies the problem.
Click to expand...

I have to be honest i never thought he was as good as he was being mad out in his first season. Not that commanding. Stones would be happy to be here for years so for me i would let him go and give Ake 30 games a year next season and use the money to get a striker.
 
BlueMoonAcrossThePond said:
We have 3 massively talented center backs - DIas is best, Stone's form has improved where he's 2nd choice, but Laporte is on par with Dias and Stones.

Hopefully management will be able to sit down with all 3 and agree with some sort of amenable deal where each player is satisfied.
Click to expand...
So it's Dias>Stones>Laporte but it's also Laporte=Dias=Stones ???

Something doesn't add up there.
 
Couldn’t get involved in the game yesterday due to so much of our attacking play being out on the wings.
The few times he dropped deep he looked a bit sluggish compared to the likes of Sterling, Mount and Foden but even the latter two didn’t influence as much as they can.
I won’t be rushing to judge him on that 90 minutes and neither should anybody else.
 
Pablo1 said:
Couldn’t get involved in the game yesterday due to so much of our attacking play being out on the wings.
The few times he dropped deep he looked a bit sluggish compared to the likes of Sterling, Mount and Foden but even the latter two didn’t influence as much as they can.
I won’t be rushing to judge him on that 90 minutes and neither should anybody else.
Click to expand...

I didn't think that Foden or Mount did much yesterday, so if we were judging them both just on yesterday we would be writing them off too. When in reality we know they are both brilliant players.

Kane is one of the best forwards in the PL if not the world. Obviously he is no Rashford as according to the commentator yesterday he is man of the year!
 
5 Hit Gibbon said:
I didn't think that Foden or Mount did much yesterday, so if we were judging them both just on yesterday we would be writing them off too. When in reality we know they are both brilliant players.

Kane is one of the best forwards in the PL if not the world. Obviously he is no Rashford as according to the commentator yesterday he is man of the year!
Click to expand...

Clearly Kane is still a very good goalscorer. A great player.

Not the point though is it if you are the person in charge of a limited budget when the club are about to announce a huge loss.

His age, injury issues, physicality , re sale value, are all relevant.

If I were the person with that budget, it would not be spent on a 28 year old, who increasingly wishes to play outside the penalty area.
 
Fordyboy46 said:
Jesus 60m, Laporte 55m, Sterling 65m out, Kane 100m, Grealish 85m, Mendes 50m in
And hopefully Mendy out 20-30m
Click to expand...
Not having a go at you, but If Grealish is worth £85m then Raheem is worth at least that, probably more.

Raheem plays for the best side in England, a team that has won 3 PL titles in 4 years, won the treble and has just been in the CL final, plus he's a regular starter in the England team.

Grealish - none of those!
 
TFC said:
This lad is going to amble around in a sky blue shirt for 90% of the games he plays next season, drive the matchday thread bellends wild, and still score 45+ goals in all comps.
6a974bf5f9524e5ebbfb0233cf5fbe831718315a.gif
Click to expand...

Looking forward to the "he looks overweight, to me" comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFC
If nothing else, yesterday showed that Kane would be no good in Spain. That sunshine sucked the fucking life out of him!! Haha!
Get yourself to the grey skies of Manchester, Harry, you'll be sound as a pound.
 
Tugay One Cup said:
Looking forward to the "he looks overweight, to me" comments.
Click to expand...
Lazy. Only ran 10.8km. Bernado ran 11.4. Doesn't track back. Let their subs run straight past him when they were warming up on the touchline. Only scores against small teams like Arsenal and Chelsea.
 
Legal Alien said:
Not having a go at you, but If Grealish is worth £85m then Raheem is worth at least that, probably more.

Raheem plays for the best side in England, a team that has won 3 PL titles in 4 years, won the treble and has just been in the CL final, plus he's a regular starter in the England team.

Grealish - none of those
Click to expand...

Keeper! said:
The only way Mendy leaves is on a free or heavily subsidized wages .
Click to expand...
We will be lucky to get anything for Mendy. Bag of crisps perhaps!!
 
Legal Alien said:
Not having a go at you, but If Grealish is worth £85m then Raheem is worth at least that, probably more.

Raheem plays for the best side in England, a team that has won 3 PL titles in 4 years, won the treble and has just been in the CL final, plus he's a regular starter in the England team.

Grealish - none of those!
Click to expand...
That really isn't how a player is valued though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top