NO, we need a top striker going into the season.Controversial perhaps but I think it's Grealish if we can't land Kane
Peps thinking is we free up the left side more for Jesus, Sterling, Torres, Phil and Delap to play more centrally
NO, we need a top striker going into the season.Controversial perhaps but I think it's Grealish if we can't land Kane
Peps thinking is we free up the left side more for Jesus, Sterling, Torres, Phil and Delap to play more centrally
Passing on a par with KDB, behave, there are few world players capable of producing the passes that he can and Grealish is definitely not one of them.Great dribbler, both across the pitch and down it, and (on his day) his passing's on a par with KDB IMO. Looks as energetic defensively too. Just can't stand how he uses "initiating contact" as a tactic (much like Kane does).
Every player makes the most of a foul from time to time and exaggerates how much it a tackle hurt.
Not every player goes looking for the contact when they're in trouble or in a dangerous area of the pitch.
This greasy prick goes down exactly the same way every time he feels contact from behind. Cheat! Plain and simple.
I don't get it, he's talent and ought to see diving as below him and a tool used by the less talented.
If he cuts out the bullshit he'll do fine with us. If he keeps it up, I just hope he gets called out for it if he's wearing sky blue.
I could see Pep making him into a box to box midfielder, a complete player, he has the energy and the personality to do it.yea Grealish was top 4 for assists and top 3 for chances created only behind KDB. He also had 2nd most take ons in the league. and his defensive contribution surprised me on how much he works for the team. 61% tackle success rate 644 duels won and 60 interceptions that’s only two less than Rodri.
And when the club finishes 8-9th on the table what would you be saying then? Or would you be very quiet? If a player is good enough age doesn't matter. Sancho probably would be in our first team by now but I think he wanted first team football sooner than we could offer.I still don't agree that we should be spending hundreds of millions on overvalued players.
We already are attacked in the press continually for buying our team.
I just feel now we have spent a billion or so it's time to start bringing through some of this young talent at our academy.
It seems that besides Foden we are not giving these lads a chance, and I know people say we sell them as they're not good enough, but what about Sancho for example, we didn't give him a chance.
The more we buy established players like Kane and Grealish the less chance for our academy players to progress at our club.
PR is very important. In my opinion we need to be perceived as a club the gives youth a chance.
When are players like Doyle and Delap ever going to have a chance ?
Well I seem to remember we did ok last season without Grealish and KaneAnd when the club finishes 8-9th on the table what would you be saying then? Or would you be very quiet? If a player is good enough age doesn't matter. Sancho probably would be in our first team by now but I think he wanted first team football sooner than we could offer.
Clearly, but it's a what if we don't land Kane scenarioNO, we need a top striker going into the season.
And you reckon we will be OK this season because of that?Well I seem to remember we did ok last season without Grealish and Kane
Even with no Aguero and an out of form Sterling
Not if there is confidence we bag our target. Or, would you prefer we bottle it and buy someone else earlier, even if not the man we want?Clearly, but it's a what if we don't land Kane scenario
The noises last night were that we're ready for it to go to last day of transfer window, madness if you ask me
I'm looking at it from the perspective of Villa and Jack. There's so much optimism here atm, that we can keep moving up the league. FFP means we can't do it on spending power alone, as Chelsea and City did. The club are recruiting really cleverly, though. Buying young talent. I'd say 90%ish of our buys have increased in value, which is great.
Jack is our marquee player, though. He's an inspiration. For where we want to go, you need to have players of Jack's quality. Imo, we have 4, maybe 5, players good enough to play for a top 4 team atm. Lose Jack, the best of the lot, and it's a HUGE step back in what we're trying to achieve. £100m won't compensate for the loss of our talisman.
From Jack's pov, regardless of other teams' fans pointing out nice things he's said about their club on Tw@tter, he's true love is Villa. He's bought into the owners' vision, which they're delivering on up to now. He didn't need to sign for 5 years last summer. He did so because it's his club, I believe. I think he was always in for another two years when signing, if we were improving, I'm sure he is ambitious, but I'm sure his ideal would be to win things with Villa. Yes, that's a BIG ask right now, we're not deluded, but the fans see the club is trying, and making good decisions. Jack sees that, too.
Now, come next summer, if we're 11th again, and not getting any nearer top 4, he may start 'considering options'.
Of course, footballinsider could be 'right', and I could look a total fool, when he signs for you the day after his holiday finishes. :-) I just don't believe it, at this moment in time.
Why how much are we paying for Grealish?True but because we're overpaying for Grealish and he's no better than what we already have.
And Kane... Fucks sake. He simply isn't worth the money they're asking.