City are the best in this league, he has played us several times, so he has had the oportunity. I dont recall him dominating us. or liverpool when they won the league, In fact, when he plays us he looks distinctly average, as he just cant get in the game. Not what you would expect for a player you are being quoted £100m for imo.He hasn't had the opportunity
Don't see why not.And you reckon we will be OK this season because of that?
Glad some fucker on here talks sense.True but because we're overpaying for Grealish and he's no better than what we already have.
And Kane... Fucks sake. He simply isn't worth the money they're asking.
I don't recall Neymar, Mbappe, Haaland and many others dominating us when we played them, so what is your pointCity are the best in this league, he has played us several times, so he has had the oportunity. I dont recall him dominating us. or liverpool when they won the league, In fact, when he plays us he looks distinctly average, as he just cant get in the game. Not what you would expect for a player you are being quoted £100m for imo.
Troll to troll would sound like sense I supposeGlad some fucker on here talks sense.
The fact you ask such a question suggests you know very little about football, so no point in trying to explain.Don't see why not.
Can you explain to me why we wouldn't ?
Ahh so no explanation why exactly the same team and squad can't do equally as well ?The fact you ask such a question suggests you know very little about football, so no point in trying to explain.
hahaha.Nah, let him carry on embarrassing himself.
read the thread moss, i was responding to a poster who said Grealish hadnt had the opportunity to play against a better team and dominate them. i just pointed out that he has.I don't recall Neymar, Mbappe, Haaland and many others dominating us when we played them, so what is your point
Not if there is confidence we bag our target. Or, would you prefer we bottle it and buy someone else earlier, even if not the man we want?