joe hart

[ID70]

I'll think you will find players like Rooney, Gerrard etc, so called more technical players than Joe gave the ball away more last night, even when not under pressure.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Also, what about Rickie Lambert's horrendous error in missing an open goal from 6 yards??? Brushed over as he scored a goal, but equaly as important as any goalkeeping error but this morning he's the media darling. For me the guy should have scored a hat-trick but goalkeepers mistakes are always highlighted more.

Goalkeeper makes a bollox yer lose 1-0; forward misses a sitter yer draw 0-0. Goalkeepers' mistakes yer left with a matter of fact; forwards' misses yer left with what might have been.

Despite what that useless tosser MadDog had to say last night the shot for the first Scottish goal dipped viciously within the last yard of its travel. I think Hart did well to get summat on it!

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

It appears you are only as good as your last game. He was outstanding against Brazil

Yes but when you have fans claiming it was his fault we lost the FA Cup final what chance do you have of reasoning with them.

Any young keeper can have ups and downs in form and Joe has been very good for us overall. However, Joe now has a lot of experience and will know his form over the last 12 months has not been good enough.

Joe's behaviour to force his way into the FA Cup Final Team means he will no longer get the level of support he enjoyed in the past if Joe is letting in soft goals.

I think you are going to have to fill me in on Joes behaviour to get in the FA Cup final team??? Support off of whom?
Is Kompany going to get a lower level of support for asking his agents to make him available this summer in case Mancini stayed?
How about Dzeko does he get support despite not giving a shit for 4 months of last season because he wanted to move?

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

When a striker misses an easy chance, it's soon forgotten. When a keeper concedes a goal he should of saved, it's scrutinised much more on replays. Joe has recently let in a few goal he should of saved, simple as that, but i'm sure he will learn from mistakes. All top keepers make mistakes and Joe is no different. Some of you clowns really need a lie down in a dark room. Pants over Hart? Better still, let's throw Joe Hart to the lions and get Perry Suckling out of retirement!

He may have lost confidence because of the way Mancini treated him. He may be suffering because of outside influences or he may just need to be brought down to earth. Replacing him for a few games may force him to get his act together.
He is not at his best. Fact.

I agree, he's not at his best and I don't think it was clever of Mancini to lambast his players to the media. I also agree that Pants should be played more, but like others have said, Hart is still considered a young(ish) keeper who is still learning. Joe hates conceding goals, the pain is etched all over his face when he's beaten. He is a very focused and determined guy and if he can carry on progressing, he may well become the (undisputed) worlds best keeper one day.

 

[kenzie115]

There are plenty of goalkeepers who make amazing saves and put in man of the match performances where it looks like they just can't be beaten but for me, the best keepers are the ones who make the least mistakes.

If a forward pings one in the top corner form 12 yards then I don't expect the keeper to save it, but if the same forward shoots straight down the middle from 25 yards I expect the keeper to catch it comfortably. Hart can be absolutely brilliant on his day and during 11/12 made very few mistakes along with putting in some top drawer performances. However, in the past 12 months he’s made a lot of mistakes (2nd highest in the Premier League last season). I see no harm in giving Pantillimon a go, he’s a very good keeper. It sounds childish but why not have a one mistake and you’re out rule? Start with Hart, and the first time he makes a howler Pantillimon replaces him for the next game, then if Pantillimon makes a blunder Hart comes back in?

 

[nobody can eat fifty eggs]

I'm still waiting for Rooney to come out and defend his mate Joe.

 

[Ducado]

I think management could see his dip in form and offered Wright a new deal. Expect to see him in net before too long

Your not a good WUM

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Call me naive but wasn't the reason for Panti not playing in the final something to do with him giving a farewell interview that was ran in the press on the morning of the match.
There's some beauties on here "Roy Keane said he was to cocky" so fuckin what. That twat was still getting over the hurt of us winning the league ffs.
Show me a keeper with know cocky confidence and I'll show you a loser. Admittedly I think he should focus more on his game rather than the commercial aspects of it but please, drop him? Get out town.
MP will choose his keeper then he'll stick with him and balls it out good bad or indifferent.
That's the way it works.

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

I see no harm in giving Pantillimon a go, he’s a very good keeper. It sounds childish but why not have a one mistake and you’re out rule? Start with Hart, and the first time he makes a howler Pantillimon replaces him for the next game, then if Pantillimon makes a blunder Hart comes back in?

Ridiculous suggestion, let's see Hart replaced and put on the naughty step near Pellegrini!

 

[City_Sean]

Just hope he gets the errors out the way before the Newcastle game.

 

[kenzie115]

I see no harm in giving Pantillimon a go, he’s a very good keeper. It sounds childish but why not have a one mistake and you’re out rule? Start with Hart, and the first time he makes a howler Pantillimon replaces him for the next game, then if Pantillimon makes a blunder Hart comes back in?

Ridiculous suggestion, let's see Hart replaced and put on the naughty step near Pellegrini!

Care to explain why it's ridiculous or were you hoping the sarcasm would suffice?

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

I see no harm in giving Pantillimon a go, he’s a very good keeper. It sounds childish but why not have a one mistake and you’re out rule? Start with Hart, and the first time he makes a howler Pantillimon replaces him for the next game, then if Pantillimon makes a blunder Hart comes back in?

Ridiculous suggestion, let's see Hart replaced and put on the naughty step near Pellegrini!

Care to explain why it's ridiculous or were you hoping the sarcasm would suffice?

Care to categorise a howler over a mistake or error?

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

I see no harm in giving Pantillimon a go, he’s a very good keeper. It sounds childish but why not have a one mistake and you’re out rule? Start with Hart, and the first time he makes a howler Pantillimon replaces him for the next game, then if Pantillimon makes a blunder Hart comes back in?

Ridiculous suggestion, let's see Hart replaced and put on the naughty step near Pellegrini!

Care to explain why it's ridiculous or were you hoping the sarcasm would suffice?

Just re read what you wrote. How can Pellegrini rotate keepers each game for merely making a mistake? They'd be getting swapped every game, and that cannot be good for anyone.

 

[kenzie115]

Ridiculous suggestion, let's see Hart replaced and put on the naughty step near Pellegrini!

Care to explain why it's ridiculous or were you hoping the sarcasm would suffice?

Care to categorise a howler over a mistake or error?

Admittedly that would be the most difficult part of implementing the system but I guess you'd just have to leave it to Pellegrini and his coaching staff to judge. May be slightly problematic if two similar incidents for the different keepers get judged differently.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Care to explain why it's ridiculous or were you hoping the sarcasm would suffice?

Care to categorise a howler over a mistake or error?

Admittedly that would be the most difficult part of implementing the system but I guess you'd just have to leave it to Pellegrini and his coaching staff to judge. May be slightly problematic if two similar incidents for the different keepers get judged differently.

It's unworkable. The only time he'll drop a keeper is for disciplinary reasons or persistent mega bollock dropping.

 

[ell]

I see no harm in giving Pantillimon a go, he’s a very good keeper. It sounds childish but why not have a one mistake and you’re out rule? Start with Hart, and the first time he makes a howler Pantillimon replaces him for the next game, then if Pantillimon makes a blunder Hart comes back in?

Ridiculous suggestion, let's see Hart replaced and put on the naughty step near Pellegrini!

Care to explain why it's ridiculous or were you hoping the sarcasm would suffice?

Confidence willl be shot and in tatters the keepers will be so scared of making mistakes they will make even more in my opinion

 

[Super David Silva 21]

Joe Hart what a shit keeper.

 

[Jnr Kisby]

Joe Hart what a shit keeper.

 

[stonerblue]

Does he kick out of play 80% of the time intentionally? I have wondered.

Strange that no-one has even bothered to mention,that it was indeed Joe who helped set up Englands 1st equaliser,with his delicate chipped ball out to Cleverley.

Not talking about isolated incidents. If he doesn't kick it out of play then he kicks/throws it ,at pace, to a full back who struggles to control it and becomes under immediate pressure.

Forced myself to watch utd once to see what van de sar did. Usually lumped it straight down centre field rather than Joe's diagonal out of play kicks.

fuckin rag all over this thread with numnerous posts slagging off Hart. You know fuck all

 

[IOWBlue]

If we put Joe up for sale, would the rags, arse and chelski want him? If you think yes then theres nothing to say.