FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
I don't think it's because he's convinced she'll do what he has historically wanted policy-wise, mate.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kamala Harris
- Thread starter idahoblues
- Start date
Bigga
Well-Known Member
I’ve just realised, @Bigga does not understand what RICO means. If any person in the ring is convicted, ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE RING ARE GUILTY. So whether Trump asked it to be done is completely irrelevant. The prosecution do not need to show his personal involvement. Read the statute, dummy.
You're a fool.
You don't seem to understand people take words out of context all the time.
I asked you to post what was said and you haven't.
Post it, prove the context.
It's ok thanks, some other posters have been less precious ;-)Your hypothetical lacks the information needed to answer it. Plus, being a hypothetical, it doesn’t require a response, especially when reality has already given us the answer.
There's been a few names mentioned and I'll be looking to see how they do in the short term.
If you think that's more important than pandering to victim demographics to keep people believing they ARE victims then I pity you.She’s the “clown” who kicked an actual clown all over that minefield while he set off explosion after explosion!
Let’s talk about illegal immigrants stealing and eating domestic cats that are actually in the owner’s basement shall we?
BOOM!!!
Oops, there goes another she tossed him on!!
Did you here the one about crowd size?
BOOM!!!
Oops, there goes another one!!
I'm happy to let the voters decide. I'm not the one on a high horse pissing on the crowd and calling it rain.I understand it all, but, using terms you should understand because you used the words…the question HAS no relevance…in context!
And, EVERY VOTER has the chance to express their displeasure about her rise to the nomination in November, if they so choose. So far, only RWNJs, most of whom don’t realize the current nomination process is a modern phenomenon, seem concerned.
You’re too intelligent to see this was not a normal situation, so the Party used what it had. If you don’t like how it happened, don’t vote for her. However, don’t pretend the concerns about Trump & democracy are anything to do with how Harris rose to lead the ticket. One is a fart in a bottle while the other is reaping the whirlwind!
I'm not voting for her. Just like if you don't like what Trump is you don't have to vote for him. Why are you stating the obvious like it's something special?
There are no concerns with Trump and Democracy. Period. If you don't like him, don't vote for him. That's more than a fair position.
There was a coup. You have to be trying hard not to see it. Pelosi herself said Biden isn't talking to her. He repeated many times he is not withdrawing. He was pushed out period.There is neither a palace nor a coup, but the obfuscation and finger pointing in any direction except at Trump is fun to watch!
They r are all complicit in the obvious cover up of his decline if nothing else. Like I say, they'll do anything to save democracy. Including kill it while they are saving it.
Now feel free to go ahead and vote for Kamala. But miss me with the pretense.
I'm not concerned. Simply pointing out the hypocrisy. Just like I did 4 years ago when the people who thought Trump was in mental decline were happy to vote for the one guy who was in a worse state and lied about as much as Trump.Why are you concerned she is the nominee? Surely, if she has so egregiously “stolen democracy,” the Left AND Right will rise up against her to protect it, no?
It's the hypocrisy!!!! Just vote who you want to vote for and stop pretending you stand on some moral high ground. Your don't.
Everyone? You mean bluemoon? A grossly unrepresentative thread mostly populated by people in foreign countries? Yeah, I'm really worried about what the English think about America. Really worried. LolOh wait, that’s EXACTLY what is happening AGAINST TRUMP, NOT HARRIS!!!
What has everyone else got wrong, while you’ve seen right through it?! HAHAHA!
Yeah yeah yeah we get it. You are good at insults. Here's a cookie.Indeed, and the whole world sees it…except the deluded. Look around…there’s one in every room. If you can’t find him, it’s you!
There are no existential threats. Period. Just 2 parties with 2 candidates. The only 2 likely to win.Thank goodness for that! I didn’t want to be impolite by so obviously feigning it!
And, lastly, if this is you “partying” we are going to need more alcohol. Not for you, you’re wasted enough…but for the rest of us!
You appear to have hitched you entire anti-“Trump is a threat to democracy” argument on how Democrats picked a nominee when Biden dropped out. It’s a great party trick, but if you’re punch drunk enough to think there is ANY existential threat from that, then you really are not smart enough to be at this party…
The rest is just hogwash.
Again, we get it. You are good at throwing insults. I already have you your cookie.OR
…you know exactly the FUD you are attempting to create, which is totally misplaced and being attempted on the wrong person, even if you might grab a simpleton or two along the way.
I spend my entire working life dealing with supposedly intelligent, politically naive, morons and there’s not a FOX talking point I have not heard or debunked, for fun, while buffing my nails!
As the E-Trade kids say in their Pickle Ball commercial. “Thanks for coming to our clinic. First one’s free!”
But pray tell, how exactly is Trump going to threaten Democracy?
What is he gonna do exactly? Go ahead, elaborate for the seemingly intelligent morons you've been schooling all your life.
How would Trump in 2028 subvert democracy if he wins in 2024?
Like I said, let's party. I'm here all day. :)
Last edited:
Where is @domalino to fact check when we need him?The context of the riot is well known:
1. “We shall patriotically walk down….etc.”
2. No action to stop it while he sat eating burgers and watching tv. Plenty of testimony from those who were there. When it comes to trial, he is looking at up to 10 years imprisonment.
As for the certificates, his RICO trial will show the extent of his participation. Read the superseding indictment.
But you knew all that, you just can’t admit he has a case to answer (see the grand jury) which makes you a useless contrarian.
mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
I’m tempted to join in but I’ve actually lost the will to live never mind debate.
How many days of this are left?
When is the election?
How many days of this are left?
When is the election?
No concerns with Trump and democracy. He ha. Fucking hell.
Whether he wins or whether he loses I have huge concerns about the threat to US democracy from him and his culture.
And by the looks so do most of the people he worked with in his first term.
Not to mention my concerns about his racism, attitude to women, criminal past and present, declining mental state etc etc.
Whether he wins or whether he loses I have huge concerns about the threat to US democracy from him and his culture.
And by the looks so do most of the people he worked with in his first term.
Not to mention my concerns about his racism, attitude to women, criminal past and present, declining mental state etc etc.
Of course you are.My side? I'm a centrist, actually slightly on the left. I don't treat political opinion as black and white like you or most others on here.
No answer of course. Why did you ask about Trump requesting the fake certificates when it is not relevant? Whether he asked or not makes no difference to a RICO indictment. Have you read Georgia’s statute and the indictment? A decent contrarian would know the relevant law. You don’t.Where is @domalino to fact check when we need him?
You’re a fake.