You’re a weirdo who has that nasty habit of stalking people, and rather than debate the issues, attack the individual instead.You came back within no time, it's why I call you Keir you're basically both liars. Say one thing in the moment then do another. You can't bear him getting any sort of criticism.
The only other reason is you are actually Keir Starmer.
Anyhow wipe your fanny Kier you dont want tears on your new suit, I know it was free but getting fitted for another one is such a ball ache you have that free dinner to attend remember.
Until the laws change, he’s guilty of being naive, not corruption, as far as I can see.
Given not much else has happened since the election was won, this, along with WFA are the two avenues available for attacking him.
As soon as something major happens, this will be a damp squib.
Because the boss likes to look at themAssuming you're a bloke, why would you be looking at dresses anywhere.
I do and that isn’t being debated because Starmer took some gifts. Therefore you’ve got to wonder what the motives for attacking the WFA decision were. People seem to have moved on to funding of a private box at a football match.You don’t see 2m pensioners struggling even more than usual to heat their homes as major?
I agree the gifts is a bit of a storm in the Westminster tea cup largely driven by the fact he promised to be better/different. I do expect he will calm it down now and this will be forgotten about in a months time. Much like the infighting on Sue Gray. The WFA is not going away however….
It’s hard being in power, the scrutiny is off the scale. Reeves was accused of being naive in WFA… perhaps a bit of a trend forming if you look at it in the round - their ambitions writing cheques their current ability cannot cash. They’re learning and will get better.
Nail on head, or he/she has a medical issueYou’re a weirdo who has that nasty habit of stalking people, and rather than debate the issues, attack the individual instead.
You remind me of the child, that nobody will talk to, so you get your kicks by resorting to little tantrums.
Sometimes people need to stop and think before posting stuff on SM, soiling yourselves in public is not a good look.
And yet not one single poster has managed a no Hilts you are wrong on this because....., not one.North Korea Whataboutery.
Whataboutery about the Whataboutery about the Whataboutery.
You debate in bad faith and are PatronisingtotheHilt.
I wouldn't say this is a left wing forum to be honest. Maybe you are more right wing than you think, or maybe I am more left wing than I think?
Says you is ironic. You crossed the line in your “debating” style this morning. Hence you got dotted.There reasons might not be though. Argue the point not the poster people
He should send every household this
They moved on to the grabbing because its this week. Both are getting mentioned. Its the order they came about. Some Tories will use these stories for their own ends, christ knows why but that's always been the case from both sides.I do and that isn’t being debated because Starmer took some gifts. Therefore you’ve got to wonder what the motives for attacking the WFA decision were. People seem to have moved on to funding of a private box at a football match.
It’s almost as if people don’t really care about the pensioners and are simply interested in attacking Starmer,