Keir Starmer

After that utterly disingenuous policy on Brexit that basically treated their core support with contempt - how can either Starmer or Thornberry be considered FFS

Simply guarantees more years of Tory government
 
And that is exactly why Thornbury fits the bill she will do both as a lawyer she has the attention to detail on policy and as child brought by a single parent on a council estate she has the character to take on Johnson. More importantly she will be the first Labour leader with the characteristics to appeal to the electorate as a smarty gutsy character who takes no shit.
I don't think you, as a collective, will ever learn, the electorate you describe was mocked and ridiculed by Thornberry
and her ilk, constantly belittling Brexit voters, sneering at the working class, and avidly supporting the character that is
Corbyn. The other alternatives being offered are even less attractive, Long Bailey and Lewis are two more far left nutters
who will still be regaling us with the same tired, bankrupt socialist nonsense that has contributed in no small manner to
the electoral wipe out you've just witnessed. Whenever anyone suggests a Blairite leader, the cult immediately leaps to
denigrate and ridicule, yet the wider voting public wants this type, unfortunately for you, the members, no matter how many
of them, have done for the Labour party.
 
I don't think you, as a collective, will ever learn, the electorate you describe was mocked and ridiculed by Thornberry
and her ilk, constantly belittling Brexit voters, sneering at the working class, and avidly supporting the character that is
Corbyn. The other alternatives being offered are even less attractive, Long Bailey and Lewis are two more far left nutters
who will still be regaling us with the same tired, bankrupt socialist nonsense that has contributed in no small manner to
the electoral wipe out you've just witnessed. Whenever anyone suggests a Blairite leader, the cult immediately leaps to
denigrate and ridicule, yet the wider voting public wants this type, unfortunately for you, the members, no matter how many
of them, have done for the Labour party.

Spot on. I don't think the core Labour vote mind posh people; nowadays many will have been to university and met people from many different backgrounds.

What people don't like is the feeling of being spoken down to - the attitude of vote for us as we know what's best for you. Whilst the likes of Cameron, May and Johnson are all posh, they don't really come across as patronising. Thornberry certainly does, as did Labour's whole Brexit policy to remove a legitimate Leave option.

Similarly, I think it's a little bit patronising to promise better public services at someone else's expense.
 
Okay then, we'll go off the targets for public debt that both Osbourne and Hammond set. None. As for the spending to get out of debt argument, I'll pass that one over to Keynes, who I have a tonne of time for. It was his ideas on public spending that lead to what many consider the golden age of modern britain. The public sector should be a motor for the economy, not just reacting to it.
Sure I get that but the general consensus in 2010 was that the deficit was too high and that were we not to take steps to reduce it then it would have had adverse effects on our credit rating and then on interest rates. Keeping rates as low as they are was imperative in order to recover investment levels and maintain liquidity. There is an argument perhaps that the brakes could have been taken off a little sooner but then Brexit came along.

Anyway, we are where we are. Let's see how it pans out from here. Will we be able to continue with more expansionary policies or will Brexit severely curtail growth and make further spending increases difficult or impossible? We'll see.
 
X factor.

Any political leader needs it.

I don't see any currently in the PLP.
 
The classic way to reduce a deficit as safely as possible involves a mix of three main actions. Obviously some cuts to spending is one, increasing revenue via tax increases is another and increasing productivity, which increases the tax take and provides a stimulus is the third. Osborne did the first but cut far too much and depressed growth. Ideology (and economic illiteracy) wouldn't allow him to do the second and we've never achieved the third. So we're still in a bit of an economic rut because of that.
I agree with the theory but not with your conclusions.

Osborne did the first, obviously but he was limited in how much of the second he could have done or that would have taken too much spending power out of the economy and depressed things further. But he did some tax raises. The higher rate band was reduced, fir example and NI was increased IIRC.

Moreover he did achieve growth. The economy turned around sharply and was in recovery and growing faster than the rest of Europe in the early parts of this decade. Perhaps we should have eased off on austerity a little sooner, I don't know.
 
I don't think you, as a collective, will ever learn, the electorate you describe was mocked and ridiculed by Thornberry
and her ilk, constantly belittling Brexit voters, sneering at the working class, and avidly supporting the character that is
Corbyn. The other alternatives being offered are even less attractive, Long Bailey and Lewis are two more far left nutters
who will still be regaling us with the same tired, bankrupt socialist nonsense that has contributed in no small manner to
the electoral wipe out you've just witnessed. Whenever anyone suggests a Blairite leader, the cult immediately leaps to
denigrate and ridicule, yet the wider voting public wants this type, unfortunately for you, the members, no matter how many
of them, have done for the Labour party.
Who is this Blairite Leaver you talk of?
 
X factor.

Any political leader needs it.

I don't see any currently in the PLP.
And if evidence for it being a requirement is needed, I give you one Theresa May. Void of any charisma or "x-factor" and abjectly awful as a PM - one of the worst we have ever had.
 
I want a good opposition but our views on what that is is obviously different but if I say she isn’t very likeable then obviously I don’t like her.

But forgive me for stating obvious but just because you don't like doesn't mean that the general public won't ? I can't stand Johnson but he is our PM but the majority of the general public do because they have just voted him in on a landslide.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.