Keir Starmer

[Alan Harper's Tash]

The open secret is so secret it’s not open at all, it’s secret.

If you can’t say it on here, could you PM me it please? ;-)

 

[Chippy_boy]

You gave a very good impression of someone who didn’t realise that her comment didn’t make any sense.

Only to one of my detractors.

And incidentally, this is what she *actually* said:

"There have long been rumors about Keir starmer's private life, and they certainly aren't to do with any kind of doubts over his sexuality, if I can put it delicately, they are to do with his past and what the shape of his family really looks like, and it wouldn't be fair to go any further than that, but this is an open secret at Westminster that those question marks have been around for a long time, and papers have been extraordinarily restrained in not publishing any that speculation"*

An open secret that there are question marks. Nothing nonsensical in that, I'm afraid.

* And if you think I transcribed that lot, you're mistaken. AI is a marvellous thing.

 

[Postman Pep]

Oh no it's the RW press again. For one thing his private office appears to be in Lord Alli's penthouse.

 

[west didsblue]

Only to one of my detractors.

And incidentally, this is what she *actually* said:

"There have long been rumors about Keir starmer's private life, and they certainly aren't to do with any kind of doubts over his sexuality, if I can put it delicately, they are to do with his past and what the shape of his family really looks like, and it wouldn't be fair to go any further than that, but this is an open secret at Westminster that those question marks have been around for a long time, and papers have been extraordinarily restrained in not publishing any that speculation"*

An open secret that there are question marks. Nothing nonsensical in that, I'm afraid.

* And if you think I transcribed that lot, you're mistaken. AI is a marvellous thing.

Try the bit around 7 minutes.
“Open secret that there’s something not in the public domain…. Might not even be true”
Even the bit you quoted sounds like complete bollocks. Open secret about rumours FFS.
You don’t realise that your hatred of Starmer makes you desperate for all these made up rumours to be true.

 

[Chippy_boy]

You don’t realise that your hatred of Starmer makes you desperate for all these made up rumours to be true.

Now you're wrong there. I absolutely realise it. I am desperate for the rumours to be true. The sooner we're rid of him the better.

I note the latest revelation of another £16k's worth of clothes declared as private office expenses. Why not call it clothes? Yet more open and honest behaviour from our favourite slimeball?

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Now you're wrong there. I absolutely realise it. I am desperate for the rumours to be true. The sooner we're rid of him the better.

I note the latest revelation of another £16k's worth of clothes declared as private office expenses. Why not call it clothes? Yet more open and honest behaviour from our favourite slimeball?

You’re going to be on 150k posts by 2029 if you’re going to itemise legally declared donations one by one.

None of which will bring down Starmer.

 

[meltonblue]

Now you're wrong there. I absolutely realise it. I am desperate for the rumours to be true. The sooner we're rid of him the better.

I note the latest revelation of another £16k's worth of clothes declared as private office expenses. Why not call it clothes? Yet more open and honest behaviour from our favourite slimeball?

Surprised me there, you don’t strike me as someone that’d rather have someone like Rayner or Lammy as PM for the next few years!

 

[Bill Walker]

Now you're wrong there. I absolutely realise it. I am desperate for the rumours to be true. The sooner we're rid of him the better.

I note the latest revelation of another £16k's worth of clothes declared as private office expenses. Why not call it clothes? Yet more open and honest behaviour from our favourite slimeball?

I don't know much about UK politics but it's absolutely no surprise to learn that the new government are just as sleazy and dishonest as the last lot.

 

[lust overlord]

I don't know much about UK politics but it's absolutely no surprise to learn that the new government are just as sleazy and dishonest as the last lot.

This lot have a long way to go,to aspire to reach the levels of sleaze and dishonesty that the last lot achieved.

 

[M18CTID]

Only to one of my detractors.

And incidentally, this is what she *actually* said:

"There have long been rumors about Keir starmer's private life, and they certainly aren't to do with any kind of doubts over his sexuality, if I can put it delicately, they are to do with his past and what the shape of his family really looks like, and it wouldn't be fair to go any further than that, but this is an open secret at Westminster that those question marks have been around for a long time, and papers have been extraordinarily restrained in not publishing any that speculation"*

An open secret that there are question marks. Nothing nonsensical in that, I'm afraid.

* And if you think I transcribed that lot, you're mistaken. AI is a marvellous thing.

What’s the open secret? Has he got more kids by more women than Johnson or summat?

 

[M18CTID]

This lot have a long way to go,to aspire to reach the levels of sleaze and dishonesty that the last lot achieved.

When he starts promoting sex pests and lies about having knowledge of what said sex pest has been up to, when he starts proroguing parliament and lies to the King about why he did it, and when he starts giving billions of pounds of PPE contracts to his mates, then we can start talking about him being as sleazy as a certain recent PM.

Fact is that while it’s currently a rocky ride for Starmer, he’s got a long way to go before he emulates that **** Johnson in the corruption stakes.

 

[mosssideblue]

You’re going to be on 150k posts by 2029 if you’re going to itemise legally declared donations one by one.

None of which will bring down Starmer.

Exactly, white noise.

 

[1961_vintage]

What’s the open secret? Has he got more kids by more women than Johnson or summat?

Seems like a particularly bizarre witch hunt based around nudge nudge wink wink hints about his sexuality. In 2024. Desperate.

 

[mosssideblue]

I don't know much about UK politics but it's absolutely no surprise to learn that the new government are just as sleazy and dishonest as the last lot.

They’re not, just a few Tory fan boys on here making out they are. Tories set a very high bar for dishonesty and sleaze

 

[Bill Walker]

This lot have a long way to go,to aspire to reach the levels of sleaze and dishonesty that the last lot achieved.

And I'm sure they'll get there given the opportunity.

 

[mosssideblue]

When he starts promoting sex pests and lies about having knowledge of what said sex pest has been up to, when he starts proroguing parliament and lies to the King about why he did it, and when he starts giving billions of pounds of PPE contracts to his mates, then we can start talking about him being as sleazy as a certain recent PM.

Fact is that while it’s currently a rocky ride for Starmer, he’s got a long way to go before he emulates that **** Johnson in the corruption stakes.

And Sunak feathering his wife’s business

 

[mosssideblue]

What’s the open secret? Has he got more kids by more women than Johnson or summat?

Now your being silly, Johnson sowed his seeds indiscriminately:)

 

[M18CTID]

And Sunak feathering his wife’s business

Yep - it wasn’t an exhaustive list. If it was then I’d be here all day and it would be the longest post in Bluemoon history!

 

[Chippy_boy]

You’re going to be on 150k posts by 2029 if you’re going to itemise legally declared donations one by one.

None of which will bring down Starmer.

Agree about them not bringing him down directly. But they will just keep adding fuel to the fire that he's dishonest, which clearly he is. I don't know what will get him in the end. Lying to parliament perhaps, or something from left field.

 

[Chippy_boy]

Surprised me there, you don’t strike me as someone that’d rather have someone like Rayner or Lammy as PM for the next few years!

You have a point. I dunno though, Rayner's more left wing of course which would be dire. I am not exactly a fan! But I don't think she's quite such a slimeball as him. I think buried in there somewhere she perhaps has a scruple or two. Which would be an improvement. She would never have cancelled the WFA for a start.

I have more chance of becoming PM than Lammy does, so we can rule that out. He wouldn't be able to fill in the paperwork correctly.