threespires
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 8,540
- Team supported
- City
I think you are wrong in this analysis, as the pit towns of the north and midlands were treated palpably worse by Thatcher and were more egregiously affected by her policies, and the residual evidence supports this.
I think the principal reason for this is Liverpool’s size, history and the fact it retained its docks, albeit in reduced scope, all of which enabled it to reinvent itself far more purposefully than pit towns such as Barnsley and Mansfield. This distinction is even more pronounced in the pit villages that surround those towns (and others) where the coal mine was the raison d’etre for the settlement in the first place. These are places where current levels of drug addiction and unemployment are far higher than in Liverpool.
Relative to such locations, Liverpool has actually benefitted long term from Thatcherism, the former of which have totally lost their way and are discernibly poorer than they were 40 years ago. That certainly could not be said about Liverpool. One only has to compare the cost of housing and the retail offering in Barnsley and Liverpool (and compare it with the picture prior to the miner’s strike in 1984) to completely appreciate that.
I happened to visit Barnsley earlier this year (and frequently visit Liverpool) and whilst the town centre was tidy, and many of the buildings well-maintained, the levels of social deprivation and chronic disability and illness among those that I saw in the town centre was striking and certainly far more pronounced than I’ve ever encountered in Liverpool. This isn’t just down to Thatcherite ’design’, it is also as a result of circumstance (both local and more widely) but to suggest that Liverpool has a particular, distinct (never mind greater) grievance with Thatcher and her policies than other places in the north, as is clearly implied when justifying booing the national anthem for that reason, is both wrong and intellectually dishonest.
Your point is very well made. I have lived in the Midlands for many years and not too far from some of the old mining areas. Many of these are simply shells now and as you say the social deprivation is enormous. Even worse, the level of social cohesion is actually lower than in comparably deprived areas because they had their core identity taken away along with their jobs. Their communities were literally destroyed, they were left to rot and decades later have never recovered.