Fairly sure no one credible said 60m. And negotiating with Leeds who are close to relegation and Brighton is hugely different
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
No matter what anyone says ,I don't believe it's fine if we don't. We shouldn't have sold zinchenko if we had no interest in getting a LB. I hope that means the club will. The makeshift defence costed us CL and fa last season. Oh wait also almost the league.Also fine if we don't. We have four players capable of playing LB.
We could sign any number of LBs in Europe, Pep clearly doesn't want them and would rather go with those he trusts.
So no not okay
Nicholas van Whatsisface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 2,717
Fairly sure no one credible said 60m. And negotiating with Leeds who are close to relegation and Brighton is hugely different
No-one credible did, you’re right.
Miguel Delaney, however, was leading with £60m in the run up to us signing him - based on absolutely nothing whatsoever. As per!
Barely scraped past last season with three fullbacks. Going into it with one less is just scary.Also fine if we don't. We have four players capable of playing LB.
We could sign any number of LBs in Europe, Pep clearly doesn't want them and would rather go with those he trusts.
dachoosen1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,554
I think arsenal came along and zinc fancied the move, the club did right by him and I'm happy they did he deserves a chance to shine and I'm sure most people at the club feel the same. Pep literally said we have alternatives does he mean mean other transfer targets? It's open to interpretation. I think we will get someone in as much as I like Cucurella it looks like raum or sosa are better value bloom can do what he wants and if he doesn't want to sell fair enough but City won't be bullied like arsenal we are the champions of England, we won 4 titles without a lb hell we won 1 without a striker I'm not sweating now.
Mancity0303
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 996
- Team supported
- Manchester City
hahahahaaha no. We simply HAVE to sign a full back. Like every club, we need 4 full backs. And not 2.Also fine if we don't. We have four players capable of playing LB.
We could sign any number of LBs in Europe, Pep clearly doesn't want them and would rather go with those he trusts.
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,592
I am sure Zinchenko was buzzing to hear that we are desperate to replace him but if he doesn't mind holding on till the end of the window to see what happens.No matter what anyone says ,I don't believe it's fine if we don't. We shouldn't have sold zinchenko if we had no interest in getting a LB. I hope that means the club will. The makeshift defence costed us CL and fa last season. Oh wait also almost the league.
So no not okay
We clearly have a lot of interest in a LB, but if a deal can't be done then we will walk away.
Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
Because he's a fuckin maggotNo-one credible did, you’re right.
Miguel Delaney, however, was leading with £60m in the run up to us signing him - based on absolutely nothing whatsoever. As per!
Ethan23
Well-Known Member
I think this as well, but then I remember we went in to last season with 0 Strikers and 9 midfielders hahareally can't believe anyone at the club is entertaining starting the season with 2 right backs and zero left backs
- Status
- Not open for further replies.