anotherbrightonfan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2022
- Messages
- 151
- Team supported
- brighton
Not since covidyou do understand that you are up against the dippers for the " net spend " trophy ?
Not since covidyou do understand that you are up against the dippers for the " net spend " trophy ?
Not since covid
Who says so. If we needed the money we would have soldYou still need the money
Getting that big champions league money in i seeWho says so. If we needed the money we would have sold
Yep it’s their trophy that every year since forever!you do understand that you are up against the dippers for the " net spend " trophy ?
The Albion have the likes of Leandro Trossard, Neal Maupay, and Alexis Mac Allister all out of contract in 2023. If Brighton cannot renew their deals, then they presumably need to be sold this summer to prevent them from being lost on free transfers the following yearWho says so. If we needed the money we would have sold
100% true and I would think the reason for the delay is Brighton securing a replacement.There is absolutely zero chance we are in advanced talks to sell Zinchenko without also being in advanced talks to signs an alternative
We have an option for another year on Trossard, you are right about the other two. We also have Sanchez, Lampty,and Coicedo who if they have seasons that they are capable of will bring us money if we need it.The Albion have the likes of Leandro Trossard, Neal Maupay, and Alexis Mac Allister all out of contract in 2023. If Brighton cannot renew their deals, then they presumably need to be sold this summer to prevent them from being lost on free transfers the following year
You need the money
Or us not accepting an offer yet.100% true and I would think the reason for the delay is Brighton securing a replacement.
I would not blame City walking away if Brighton will not budge on the asking price, nor do I blame Brighton for not budging, he is there player and they have a value, they do not have to sell, unhappy player, well that's there business.City seems will walk away if Brighton does not budge with their asking price, his long contract remains a stumbling block on why Brighton have the upper hand on why they remain stick to their gun for Cucurella asking price.
It will be different if he still only have 3 or 2, but 4? Yeah good luck with that. Rather we should walk away tbh, It will be Brighton problem if the said player is underperform next season even if said player looks happy on outside. We should go to the next possible LB that will be approachable for asking price.
Where is there a hint that he is an unhappy player?I would not blame City walking away if Brighton will not budge on the asking price, nor do I blame Brighton for not budging, he is there player and they have a value, they do not have to sell, unhappy player, well that's there business.
He might become that if he doesn’t move to us.. just sayingWhere is there a hint that he is an unhappy player?
There may be an unhappy player if he doesn’t get the moveWhere is there a hint that he is an unhappy player?
I would not think Zinch's move would effect us looking for a LBOr us not accepting an offer yet.
I would hazard a guess that, if Brighton don't sell and they deny the player a move to the Premier league champions therefore denying him Champions League football, he wouldn't be happy.Where is there a hint that he is an unhappy player?