City Raider
Well-Known Member
the kompany analysis had obviously been decided before the game, then they took what they could in the edit - not much
neville's analysis shames the bbc
neville's analysis shames the bbc
danburge82 said:I personally love the hate and would hate it if they were creaming themselves over us, blowing smoke up our arse without meaning it or wanting to do it or being false about it all. At least they hate or they're jealous of us and they're showing it and not hiding behind lies about the way they feel about us. I'd much rather have it this way.
manimanc said:Did slur shakin bacon really bemoan the fact that they only got four extra minutes and how was you supposed to score a goal in that amount of time?
Didnt they have 90mins to do that?
The piss can is losing the plot..
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:Cityfan said:Because they don't have enough time to analyse matches they don't watch.
Yet they had time to analyze our away kit and Kompany's 'mistakes'.
The penalty decisions did not change the result.
It was a talking point; a controversial decision that was obviously very poor. Their excuse for not discussing it was laughable.
They cannot analyse every penalty decision in every match.
The penalty decision was far more worthy of discussion than our away kit, yet they decided to discuss the later. Laughable!
Kompany has been poor by his standards this season sa they don't have time to analyse the match they went with this before hand.
They don't have time to analyse the match, yet they have time to analyze Kompany's performance during that match?
Er, okaaay...
DavidSilvasLeftFoot said:Did everyone see Fergie's interview? Did I hear correctly that he was complaining that there was only 4 minutes injury time?