Nathan Ake

As long as we don’t get our pants pulled down it might be a surprise success. We did want him before and although hisform is awful, the red shite have ruined the player.

Is Pep trying to coach the England team through City?

Did he mention a fee?
It was over the phone, and the reception wasn't brilliant, but it sounded like 70m (may have been 17, as I said, the reception was poor).
 
It was over the phone, and the reception wasn't brilliant, but it sounded like 70m (may have been 17, as I said, the reception was poor).
I hope it was a dodgy line at that price. Someone somewhere is laughing their ass off at that business. Just when you think Txiki has got his act together. Gotta be a joke.

Rather have bony back in defence.
 
Bajkowski has said about replacement. We don't need an expensive backup, why are people demanding the big names of a defender when we don't need that kind of player? Be creative, find someone cheap, versatile, but good as a backup. Why are we making the squad thinner than we don't need to? It makes zero sense.
Because if they are cheap, most likely they aren't good enough even as 4th choice.
 
In Chelsea's case with Abramovich he wouldn't of given Tuchel more control. The likes of Nathan Ake and Raheem Sterling wouldn't of been considered.
 
Last edited:
Not anywhere near good enough on the ball for City. A half decent defender though
I think he could be as good as Ake on the ball.
He is in the high percentiles of passing stats among defenders. He could be available for around the same fee as Ake - he is only young and could easily be trained up to improve on the ball.
 
We overplayed for him at the time.
If we can sell for a profit and re invest I wouldn’t be that arsed
I don’t think ake at Chelsea would worry me too much
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top