Next Manager after Pep

[ozcityfan]

Spot on.

Was anyone suggesting Stevie G when he had a half decent start at Villa after success in Glasgow ?

Ange has doubled Stevie G success at the very least. Also turned around Celtic and smashed his legacy.

 

[bluemanchester]

Lol, okay.

None of that changes the way we replaced managers could have been better.

It’s well known that Mancini was in the stadium the day Hughes left. Maybe he wasn’t in the boardroom, but he was certainly around somewhere.

We get better managers each time, but hang the current ones out to dry.

Im not sure we will get better next time either!

Unless you have proof and evidence Mancini was in the stadium when Hughes was sacked I suggest you withdraw your viewpoint and stop peddling that line. Otherwise you are doing the same thing we accuse the media and press of.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Ok, I don’t recall well enough to try to debate that. It still left Hughes as a dead man walking wherever Mancini was.

@bluemanchester

Try reading the thread.

 

[bluemanchester]

@bluemanchester

Try reading the thread.

Try accepting you are wrong.
Hughes was a dead man walking because he was not good enough.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Try accepting you are wrong.

Correcting someone on the internet is serious business.

We dealt with the Hughes sacking poorly wherever Mancini was.

The fact you’re bickering over where he was seems important to you, so as I have already ceded that I don’t recall clearly, I will state that I am happy to take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium.

It doesn’t change very much though.

 

[bluemanchester]

Correcting someone on the internet is serious business.

We dealt with the Hughes sacking poorly wherever Mancini was.

The fact you’re bickering over where he was seems important to you, so as I have already ceded that I don’t recall clearly, I will state that I am happy to take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium.

It doesn’t change very much though.

I am not bickering I am pulling you up on something you stated as fact which has been proved many times as false. So withdraw your claim Mancini was in the stadium because if you were not certain he was you are as bad as the press and media that peddle their views.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I am not bickering I am pulling you up on something you stated as fact which has been proved many times as false. So withdraw your claim Mancini was in the stadium because if you were not certain he was you are as bad as the press and media that peddle their views.

Have you read my two previous replies?

Am I being clarkied here?

 

[bluemanchester]

Have you read my two previous replies?

Am I being clarkied

Have you read my two previous replies?

Am I being clarkied here?

No your not been clarkied, you have been pulled up on a false claim whilst trying to put down our management, the best management team in world football In none of your 2 replies have you withdrawn your statement, do so now and it is over.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

No your not been clarkied, you have been pulled up on a false claim whilst trying to put down our management, the best management team in world football In none of your 2 replies have you withdrawn your statement, do so now and it is over.

I will take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium the day that our board decided to sack our manager immediately after winning a game. Something that was common knowledge, but not confirmed.

 

[bluemanchester]

I will take your word that he wasn’t in the stadium the day that our board decided to sack our manager immediately after winning a game. Something that was common knowledge, but not confirmed.

I really dont want you to take my word, it has been well documented he was not there. You claimed he was to belittle our management which for a City supporter is unbelievable after what they have done for our club. As someone with over 60k posts and a major contributor to Bluemoon you really have to withdraw your statement not use diversion tactics to claim you have when you certainly haven't.