kaz7
Well-Known Member
urmston said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:urmston said:For the amount paid in by the employee a public sector pension still gives a gigantically good return even with the increased contributions and retirement ages that are being introduced for them.
Private firm pensions which offer the same benefits have nearly all been shut down and are now as rare as hen's teeth. Many people in private work are now on short hours or zero hour contracts specifically designed to exclude them from employer pension rights at all.
The public sector pension deficit is stupendously huge.
For example, when the government sold the Royal Mail for £3 billion or so, it could only get rid of it by keeping its £28 billion pension deficit on the public books.
This just shows you how expensive public employees are to the taxpayer, and why there is certainly no need to be more generous to them at a time when most private sector people are suffering at least as much and haven't got a hope in hell of a big fat, taxpayer guaranteed pension when they give up work.
If you employed by the public it is greedy and inconsiderate to expect pay rises when most of the people who employ you are not getting them and have suffered pay freezes, pay cuts and job losses which make your 5 year pay freeze look wonderful in comparison.
Fucking hell,now I know you are wumming...Everyone in both the private and public sector deserves a pay rise equivalent to at least the cost of living.
In real terms I have had a pay cut. No rise for 5 years,increased pension/national insurance contributions.
If NHS staff deserve a pay rise who should pay for it?
There's only one place the money can come from - more taxes paid by private sector workers, most of whom have had it much worse than NHS staff have over the last decade or so.
To expect a pay rise financed by people who have suffered at least as much as you and probably more in the financial crisis is greedy and inconsiderate in my book.
You do know public sector workers pay tax,right ?