North Stand expansion - seating, ticketing etc

Ah so your ARE involved in 1894, maybe that's the problem, your way or the highway...chill otherwise you will be having a heart attack mate...
P.S i can post what i want when i want, its my opinion...
Wrong again sunshine. I just can't be arsed with clowns who are only here to wind others up. Oh, and just to make it clear - that's not an 1894 position. It's my own personal stance.

And no - you can't post what you want when you want because certain things go against the forum's code of conduct. You'd do well to have a read of it if you want to keep posting on here.
 
Not everyone on Citymatters agrees though, sometimes a lack of statement is because they can’t agree. As shown by the strike last year half did half didn’t. Some went to protests some didn’t.

Citymatters are also not independent of the club. Neither are the OSC. Both use club facilities for meetings.

Different groups stand for different things. Osc stand for their members. DSA for their members. And so on.

We would disagree with trade union blues for example when stewards are out of line at City. We might criticise them publicly. They would be against that as they see it as they are workers with workers rights.

Often you see loads of different groups all pulling in the same direction in the same statement. That’s actually a strong message because it means people with slightly differing views compromise enough to come together.

We’re all on the same side but there’s room for everyone.
There's no reason that people can't belong to one or more then at least?
 
Wrong again sunshine. I just can't be arsed with clowns who are only here to wind others up. Oh, and just to make it clear - that's not an 1894 position. It's my own personal stance.

And no - you can't post what you want when you want because certain things go against the forum's code of conduct. You'd do well to have a read of it if you want to keep posting on here.
Oh so you run bluemoon as well, here's me thinking it was Ric ? Wind people up ? It's an opinion like your's, you obviously can't have a meaningful discussion...
 
You can't have EVERYTHING, the cost is 350 million plus, a huge amount of investment, can't you just accept decisions have to be made regarding finance ? Yes we all want £10 tickets etc etc but it ain't happening.
You can't have everything. What do you mean?

You're really are confusing the subject, swinging from one subject to another subject, and once again siding with the club

It's really not hard to understand is it. We're discussing improving the atmosphere, not the cost of the stand.

We are now working with what the club have given the fans, not what the fans really wanted

Just one more time for old times sake.

It doesn't cost anything to create a dedicated singing section/block within the 3000 safe standing seats.

It doesn't cost anything to create a dedicated youth singing section/block within the 3000 safe standing seats.

Both blocks or combined blocks would improve the noise and the atmosphere coming from NSL2.

Who said anything about £10 tickets. I didn't mention £10 tickets. My continued and clear points being, the club can and should be doing more to facilitate a better atmosphere inside the Etihad by creating dedicated singing sections/blocks within the 3000 safe standing seats on NSL2. So far the club hasn't. FACT!

I'll leave it at that with you, because we're obviously going around in circles.
 
There's no reason that people can't belong to one or more then at least?
Of course not I have been in 7 different Osc branches in my time and most of our leaders are in a branch

Most people have dual membership
We’ve given talks at Osc branches and had donations from them at times

You wouldn’t expect someone to be on the committee of 1894 and the committee of the Osc for example. (The nearest we got to that was the late great Tommy Muir from Cheadle Osc who got involved with us but was always an Osc person first and foremost)
 
You can't have everything. What do you mean?

You're really confusing the subject, swinging from one subject to another subject, and once again siding with the club

It's really not hard to understand is it. We're discussing improving the atmosphere not the cost of the stand.

We are now working with what the club have given the fans, not what the fans really wanted

Just one more time for old times sake.

It doesn't cost anything to create a dedicated singing section block within the 3000 safe standing seats.

It doesn't cost anything to create a dedicated youth singing block within the 3000 safe standing seats.

Both blocks or combined blocks would improve the noise and the atmosphere coming from NSL2.

Who said anything about £10 tickets. I didn't mention £10 tickets. My continued and clear points being, the club can and should do more to facilitate a better atmosphere inside the Etihad by creating dedicated singing sections and blocks within the 3000 safe standing seats on NSL2.

I'll leave it at that with you, because we're obviously going around in circles.
Good :)
 
Oh so you run bluemoon as well, here's me thinking it was Ric ? Wind people up ? It's an opinion like your's, you obviously can't have a meaningful discussion...
I think I'm a bit more capable than you of having a meaningful discussion. I don't tend to put apostrophes in words that don't need them either.

Now run along and don't be a **** all your life - there's a good boy
 
Since the club allocated 10% of the away tickets to the youth, which is a great idea, our away support, which has always been good, has got better.

So why hasn't the club allocated a block of safe standing seats on NSL2 to the youth? 500 youth singers all together in a safe standing block on NSL3 would make a right racket.

It's obvious ideas and initiatives like that the club should be taking forward and implementing before the stand opens next year
Certainly helped the Colombian economy
 
I think I'm a bit more capable than you of having a meaningful discussion. I don't tend to put apostrophes in words that don't need them either.

Now run along and don't be a **** all your life - there's a good boy
I don't think you can call people **** on here, code of conduct and all that...
 
If the Cross Bar is the seats at the front of the 2nd tier then fans have to be moved.

Addition to the above. The statement doesn't specify which seats aren't moving. Just that seats aren't moving to accommodate one bar, but are to accommodate another bar.

I think they have been clever with the wording, as I said yesterday.
 
I know not everyone follows this thread, but we covered this back in the summer, along with many other amendements as they have happened.

Nothing meaningful has changed here. The title 'cross bar' was added and not noticed, but the location size and access of that GA+ bar and the GA+ in general is exactly as it always was.

The 500 bar within the City Hall and any seats associated with that, that's the less clear bit. And open to the interpretation of it possibly being additional GA+, in the sudenness and vagueness around it.
I currently sit in North Stand block 037 row 19 (right behind the goals) and got an email yesterday saying my seat is not affected by the announcement.
For what it's worth, I think the back few rows will get comfy seats and will have access to City Hall which can be entered across from the concourse, which is a similar set up to 93.20.
Any additional capacity to City Hall will probably be sold off as a membership only, giving access to City hall for season ticket holders located elsewhere in the ground and not getting a comfy seat.
The bars in City hall will service City square, but fans in city square will not have access to it.
City Hall can be opened up on non match days for gigs at co-op live etc without access to the stadium concourse etc
 
Odd, I can only see one drawing listed against NSE-POP-ZZ-ZZ-DR-A-009100 (rev 1) which is L00 so shows City Hall. The Cross Bar as it's now known is on L01 "NORTH STAND L01, COMMERCIAL L01 & HOTEL L01 PLAN" NSE-POP-ZZ-ZZ-DR-A-009101 REV 01.
I will try and post a link or download it
 
I currently sit in North Stand block 037 row 19 (right behind the goals) and got an email yesterday saying my seat is not affected by the announcement.
For what it's worth, I think the back few rows will get comfy seats and will have access to City Hall which can be entered across from the concourse, which is a similar set up to 93.20.
Any additional capacity to City Hall will probably be sold off as a membership only, giving access to City hall for season ticket holders located elsewhere in the ground and not getting a comfy seat.
The bars in City hall will service City square, but fans in city square will not have access to it.
City Hall can be opened up on non match days for gigs at co-op live etc without access to the stadium concourse etc

All makes sense. Could be worse, think many would take that.
 
Strange isn't.

The club created a dedicated safe standing, singing block, 115, on SSL1.

But the club haven't so far created a dedicated safe standing, singing block, on NSL2, the new home end.

Maybe the club don't want 500-1000 rowdy and noisy singers and youth in-front of the hotel balconies, and behind the GA seating?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top