I was looking forward to seeing Rostov's goal on the BBC bulletin this morning but no. So much for balanced coverage.
So the BBC and MUTV are the the same thing?
Never saw the Blackburn goal either but every time they showed Kun's tap-in as they called it against Huddersfield I was treated to their goal.I was looking forward to seeing Rostov's goal on the BBC bulletin this morning but no. So much for balanced coverage.
So the BBC and MUTV are the the same thing?
I think that the media are simply more harsh on you because of the money influx. They expect big things from you, and so when you fail. It's all "Ah see, money can't buy you x."
I dunno, maybe im wrong. But that's how I see it. They judge you much more strictly than any other side.
I think that the media are simply more harsh on you because of the money influx. They expect big things from you, and so when you fail. It's all "Ah see, money can't buy you x."
I dunno, maybe im wrong. But that's how I see it. They judge you much more strictly than any other side.
Nah it is more than that. There are Liverpool and Utd pundits, fans working in the backroom, the media is infested with them and they are all pushing their own agenda. Utd spent a comparable amount to City yet it is City who are targeted. Little things like that. The negativity in City games commented on by Liverpool ex players is demoralising, listening to Utd pundits sticking the boot in because it supports their team... BBC manutd fanboy reporters who get exclusive access and reports from Utd for nothing? no way it is for pushing, ever so slightly, the positivity towards Utd or LiverpoolI think that the media are simply more harsh on you because of the money influx. They expect big things from you, and so when you fail. It's all "Ah see, money can't buy you x."
I dunno, maybe im wrong. But that's how I see it. They judge you much more strictly than any other side.
I think that the media are simply more harsh on you because of the money influx. They expect big things from you, and so when you fail. It's all "Ah see, money can't buy you x."
I dunno, maybe im wrong. But that's how I see it. They judge you much more strictly than any other side.
And what exactly has £89 million (and possibly more) bought that shower of shite yet hardly a word or criticismI think that the media are simply more harsh on you because of the money influx. They expect big things from you, and so when you fail. It's all "Ah see, money can't buy you x."
I dunno, maybe im wrong. But that's how I see it. They judge you much more strictly than any other side.
Nah it is more than that. There are Liverpool and Utd pundits, fans working in the backroom, the media is infested with them and they are all pushing their own agenda. Utd spent a comparable amount to City yet it is City who are targeted. Little things like that. The negativity in City games commented on by Liverpool ex players is demoralising, listening to Utd pundits sticking the boot in because it supports their team... BBC manutd fanboy reporters who get exclusive access and reports from Utd for nothing? no way it is for pushing, ever so slightly, the positivity towards Utd or Liverpool
I mean look at Liv, nothing won, spent and spent and spent and under achieved yet they get more favorable coverage than City.
We dont think there is a conspiracy, but until we have had a generation of City players getting into the media and actually supporting our endeavours we will have to put up with this shit.
BBC's leading headlines in the last 24 hours, complete with a section from Simon Stones on how not everything is going well. Weird how no one else gets this treatment.
BBC's leading headlines in the last 24 hours, complete with a section from Simon Stones on how not everything is going well. Weird how no one else gets this treatment.
The bias is unrelenting from the BBC, I was irked by the positive spin they put on the headline "Man United score away goal in Rostov draw". As if it was some sort of fucking achievement. Not United struggle to a draw, or United lucky to escape with a draw, or even just United frustrated with draw.
So I did a little digging to about the author Shamoon Hafez. Now automatically I suspected he was a dyed in the wool rag fan. His Twitter seems to confirm it. Every other post is hashtag MUFC. https://twitter.com/ShamoonHafez?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
Now as a journalist I appreciate you may have allegiances, but Christ there should be some independent reporting going on if you are a journalist for the BBC? Or at least don't make it so blindingly obvious.