gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I’ll wager Harris ten minutes after his third line.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Defo! Then we nail the gobshite!I’ll wager Harris ten minutes after his third line.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
He’s got more faces than the town hall clock that one. My boss - a United fan - said he heard Neville the other week praising City’s business model, yet there are other occasions where he’s giving ammunition to the conspiracy theorists about our revenue. Funny how there was no fallout over United’s deal with Chevrolet which resulted in the guy who brokered it getting sacked for giving them too much money. Surely that’s the very definition of an over-inflated deal in plain sight.You have to laugh. Gary Neville cannot understand how Citys revenue can be higher than uniteds. So let me get this straight Gary, the most publicised, Investigated, commented on sponsorship contract deals in World football, where the values for the major sponsors contracts were openly discussed and stated in court findings.
Where new shirt manufacturers sponsorship deal values are openly available on the Internet along with revenue from all competitions and you can include TV revenue in with that too.
Better still open sources like Swiss Ramble who do a fantastic job of laying it all out for you. Your rags have won next to fuck all in a decade where City have hoovered up silverware after silverware. Yet you still cannot understand? I'd suggest you're thick as a pisstone then Gary. Either that or you're lying through your back teeth to appease and confirm the conspiracy theorists amongst your dickhead twitter following and other morons who listen to your utterings on social media platforms. I suspect it’s the latter so just fuck off Gary, you're fucking boring us with your uninformed bullshit.
Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,341
And team viewerHe’s got more faces than the town hall clock that one. My boss - a United fan - said he heard Neville the other week praising City’s business model, yet there are other occasions where he’s giving ammunition to the conspiracy theorists about our revenue. Funny how there was no fallout over United’s deal with Chevrolet which resulted in the guy who brokered it getting sacked for giving them too much money. Surely that’s the very definition of an over-inflated deal in plain sight.
2 very dubious deals
Blue_Lightsaber
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2022
- Messages
- 2,173
- Team supported
- Man City
I wrote eight premier league titles?
Yeah I get what you said and agree but it's seven at the moment..
Dribble
Well-Known Member
That's why City putting forward a viable alternative wouldn't work, but if one was put forward on City's behalf, at the very least it'd show up FFP/PSR for the bullshit rules they are.Perhaps they have but not in public, the trouble is there's too many Yank owned clubs. Going public wouldn't change the outcome and it's not in the owners nature to get into a public spat.
First & foremost, in what other business sector is an owner not allowed to invest his money into his business?
If saddling a club with debts is the issue, then all money over a certain level should only be share equity, & not owner/commercial loans levied against the club which can be called in.
This alone resolves the "Bad owner saddling the club with unsustainable debt" claims.
Last edited:
Dribble
Well-Known Member
It makes sense to City fans, but because it didn't benefit other fans, they wouldn't listen & why would they?Everything we've done since the takeover has made sense. No-one is listening
The same way there's been over a decade of "FFP cheats" drip fed to the media, City can easily drip feed an alternative at arms length.
It's easily done & highly achievable.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
PR & Marketing companies rarely put their names to campaigns, & the nature of this alternative FFP/PSR campaign should be more organic than in your face, so as to not make it obvious it's come from City.Interesting.
Unless someone is prepared to financially underwrite such a campaign, or an 'agency' will take it on on a ' no fee' basis, enthusiastic amateurs are unlikely to proceed.
It'll be a very expensive drip, drip,drip of case copy.
Happy to help.
It can be a combination carefully placed suggestions with friendly journalists, & organically created social media threads across several platforms which could then be picked up & disseminated by fans.
Trust me, for a relatively small investment, we could seriously change the FFP/PSR narrative from the shitshow it currently is, to a workable one.
We've several accounting & legal experts amongst us who could help sort the FFP/PSR alternative wheat from the chaff, to formulate a viable alternative.
No one else is going to do this for us, so why aren't we doing this for ourselves?
Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 3,033
- Team supported
- City
PR & Marketing companies rarely put their names to campaigns, & the nature of this alternative FFP/PSR campaign should be more organic than in your face, so as to not make it obvious it's come from City.
It can be a combination carefully placed suggestions with friendly journalists, & organically created social media threads across several platforms which could then be picked up & disseminated by fans.
Trust me, for a relatively small investment, we could seriously change the FFP/PSR narrative from the shitshow it currently is, to a workable one.
We've several accounting & legal experts amongst us who could help sort the FFP/PSR alternative wheat from the chaff, to formulate a viable alternative.
No one else is going to do this for us, so why aren't we doing this for ourselves?
You may be right.PR & Marketing companies rarely put their names to campaigns, & the nature of this alternative FFP/PSR campaign should be more organic than in your face, so as to not make it obvious it's come from City.
It can be a combination carefully placed suggestions with friendly journalists, & organically created social media threads across several platforms which could then be picked up & disseminated by fans.
Trust me, for a relatively small investment, we could seriously change the FFP/PSR narrative from the shitshow it currently is, to a workable one.
We've several accounting & legal experts amongst us who could help sort the FFP/PSR alternative wheat from the chaff, to formulate a viable alternative.
No one else is going to do this for us, so why aren't we doing this for ourselves?
It needs a mixed speciality action group, NOT a COMMITTEE
'One volunteer is better than nine pressed men'.
I'll help if I can.
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 12,535
Your entire point is predicated on your belief that our hierarchy want and alternative to FFP/PSR. I don't think they care what rules are in place - they will comply and winPR & Marketing companies rarely put their names to campaigns, & the nature of this alternative FFP/PSR campaign should be more organic than in your face, so as to not make it obvious it's come from City.
It can be a combination carefully placed suggestions with friendly journalists, & organically created social media threads across several platforms which could then be picked up & disseminated by fans.
Trust me, for a relatively small investment, we could seriously change the FFP/PSR narrative from the shitshow it currently is, to a workable one.
We've several accounting & legal experts amongst us who could help sort the FFP/PSR alternative wheat from the chaff, to formulate a viable alternative.
No one else is going to do this for us, so why aren't we doing this for ourselves?