We set them based on probability derived from any applicable data we have. In some instances we just set all possible outcomes at evens and let the market form itself. Not many trades are needed before the market sets itself anyway.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
The wisdom of the crowd.We set them based on probability derived from any applicable data we have. In some instances we just set all possible outcomes at evens and let the market form itself. Not many trades are needed before the market sets itself anyway.
I always thought a soft bookmaker used WOTC while a sharp bookmaker backed its own information like Pinnacle.
Then a level up again you get a Company like Smartodds or Starlizard who take on and beat the bookies…mostly in Asian markets.
Last edited:
They are essentially value betters, very good ones but they are just spotting value in the market.The wisdom of the crowd.
I always thought a soft bookmaker used WOTC while a sharp bookmaker backed its own information like Pinnacle.
Then a level up again you get a Company like Smartodds or Starlizard.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Have we been relegated yet??, stripped of titles and fined a billion quid??
The PL are waiting for the odds to go up to 14s first.
blueloon
Well-Known Member
That is all something over nothing. What we need to understand is we have to work with the Premier League. It will not benefit our owners to make things too toxic. Our owners know what they are doing. Comments coming out on social media are just noise. With the greatest of respect the majority of people know f""k all about what is going on. It would have been better for everyone concerned that this case didn't come into the public knowledge. The media were only helping themselves when they pushed for it to be released. We are all going to have to sit back and wait to see what happens. As ever, speculation will always be the enemy of calm.Also Masters finding himself “unable/unwelcome” to present the PL trophy to the four times champions speaks for itself. Khaldoon recently bigging-up Allison Brittain and the lady Chair of the FA tells me that Masters is fucked and the club are looking beyond his toxic regime with an eye to the future.
blueyorkie
Well-Known Member
If I’m not mistaken there was a court case where they ruled against City & the League who both wanted the matter to be kept private. I doubt they realised what horrendous effects that judgement precipitated.
I hope you are not being too optimistic.'The gutless shithousery of the minority'.
No sporting ambition, pride or integrity....but City are ruining football.
The long game played by the club is now in its 14th/15th year, and now just maybe, the scales are being lifted from some of our detractors eyes.
The irrational consequences of many of the red cartel influenced laws, are becoming clearer to an increasing number of clubs and fans.
The number of clubs in conflict & litigation with the PL is just one indicator of discord and distrust.
The unintended consequences of the ill thought out PSR rule may just be the wake up call.
Much of this is coming together in a delta leading up to our hearing.
It is SO important that City are cleared of all significant charges, forcing a beneficial change at the PL, and allowing common sense and sporting ability to be front and centre of the game.
Hopefully, the wider game will recognise the wisdom and fortitude of the Sheikh & Kool Hand ....and the malignant intentions of the red yank cartel.
They wanted to make it public with tickets limited to blues who went to York, but 100,000 applied.Two brilliant minds.
An irresistible force v an immovable object.
A gladiatorial battle of legal chess ....what a shame it can't be live.