Re: Mangala
Also where would any of these played? Our first team has Silva and Nasri in it, how can Sanchez and Fabregas fit into that. There is no way they would come here to sit on the bench so you either sell Silva or Nasri to accommodate. I wouldn't take anyone in the world over Silva but I would take Fabregas over Nasri but then again I don't think I would be that bothered about it. Sanchez is doing good at Arsenal because they have no-one else and where are Arsenal in the league? As for Fabregas at Chelsea, he has done well but where was he against Spurs? I have never seen Silva go missing in a game.
bitsmith said:Dax777 said:Like I believed in the summer, and still do now, Mangala, the goalie and Fernando were luxury purchases. The money spent on them could have been better spent elsewhere.
But we went this way, so here we are. Decent buys, not the best decisions in my opinion. And their combined performances have not changed my opinion on that. The guys I thought we should have targeted with our limited funds on the other hand, Fabregas and Sanchez? Well they've proved instrumental where they went.
we needed covers in the area we bought much more than in those where sanchez and fabregas operate
Also where would any of these played? Our first team has Silva and Nasri in it, how can Sanchez and Fabregas fit into that. There is no way they would come here to sit on the bench so you either sell Silva or Nasri to accommodate. I wouldn't take anyone in the world over Silva but I would take Fabregas over Nasri but then again I don't think I would be that bothered about it. Sanchez is doing good at Arsenal because they have no-one else and where are Arsenal in the league? As for Fabregas at Chelsea, he has done well but where was he against Spurs? I have never seen Silva go missing in a game.