Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Dippers would want nothing less than Aguero and Silva for part payment for Flanagan!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum
- Thread starter Kippax.
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Dippers would want nothing less than Aguero and Silva for part payment for Flanagan!
Cellarite
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 25,958
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Dippers would want nothing less than Aguero and Silva for part payment for Flanagan!
Fuck off! We'd have to transport the South Stand to Liverpool to be able to afford Flanagan.
spacecadet
Well-Known Member
Dippers would want nothing less than Aguero and Silva for part payment for Flanagan!
Always on the money young Ewing pmslSecond team ? Your credibility ends there.
burning blue soul
Well-Known Member
....bet he's an expert on car stereo types though ;)
now THAT.....is comedy!!! well done brother.
Universidad de Chile
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I guess you´re right.Not homegrown mate.
Still not really worth the whole money Sterling, IMO.
Hazard was £35.2m 3 years ago when he was 21, without prem experience and from an average league.
I doubt sterling will cost £50m, see it being around the £40m and if he turns out to be the player his potential says he can be he will be worth every penny.
I doubt sterling will cost £50m, see it being around the £40m and if he turns out to be the player his potential says he can be he will be worth every penny.
malg
Well-Known Member
Bid the fucking house for him.......he's worth it.
Oh, there's a few beers behind this post.........but I mean it.....!
Oh, there's a few beers behind this post.........but I mean it.....!
Kippax.
Well-Known Member
Pleasure is all mine mate. I'm never going to be mean about a great club like Liverpool unlike some of these gloryhunters. They're my second team in honesty, and we could benefit from knowing our relative position in the world of football as a fanbase, especially when it comes to attracting players and the relative prestige of our clubs. we have all the money in the world but sometimes that isn't enough as Sanchez and others have shown.
I'm sure he will love the matrix writing.
Last edited by a moderator:
franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 10,636
The value of the player and the value of the player to us are two very different valuations.
The one element missing in our side is directness, pace and the ability to beat a man and create that little bit of space. What our team is great at is retaining possession and then overloading areas of the pitch (out wide typically) and relying on that person to provide the final ball.
Sadly this year that 'moment' or responsibility has been left to Navas or the full backs. I have lost count of the number of times Navas has failed to deliver both with his shots and crossing.
Secondly relying on the crispness of passing and the movement of players is fantastic when players are on song but not as effective when there is a lack of confidence or form of key individuals. The passing can become a bit pedestrian resulting in a packed defence not being shifted about to create an opening when two banks of four are sat on the edge of the 18 yard box. A player like Sterling would provide us with that bit of individual ability to beat a player which will give us another string in our armoury to open the door.
Chuck in also the fact he is homegrown (which we need this summer), his age (therefore likely sell-on value) the player probably has more value to us than other clubs.
35/40 million would be a good price for us and I think the club has realised buying lesser talents, more cheaply, has proven a false economy.
Good luck to the Scousers they probably thought 80 million for Suarez was great money/deal. Well one team was propelled to the treble and the other squandered the money on second rate players and finished out of Champs League.
The one element missing in our side is directness, pace and the ability to beat a man and create that little bit of space. What our team is great at is retaining possession and then overloading areas of the pitch (out wide typically) and relying on that person to provide the final ball.
Sadly this year that 'moment' or responsibility has been left to Navas or the full backs. I have lost count of the number of times Navas has failed to deliver both with his shots and crossing.
Secondly relying on the crispness of passing and the movement of players is fantastic when players are on song but not as effective when there is a lack of confidence or form of key individuals. The passing can become a bit pedestrian resulting in a packed defence not being shifted about to create an opening when two banks of four are sat on the edge of the 18 yard box. A player like Sterling would provide us with that bit of individual ability to beat a player which will give us another string in our armoury to open the door.
Chuck in also the fact he is homegrown (which we need this summer), his age (therefore likely sell-on value) the player probably has more value to us than other clubs.
35/40 million would be a good price for us and I think the club has realised buying lesser talents, more cheaply, has proven a false economy.
Good luck to the Scousers they probably thought 80 million for Suarez was great money/deal. Well one team was propelled to the treble and the other squandered the money on second rate players and finished out of Champs League.
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Common sense post of the dayThe value of the player and the value of the player to us are two very different valuations.
The one element missing in our side is directness, pace and the ability to beat a man and create that little bit of space. What our team is great at is retaining possession and then overloading areas of the pitch (out wide typically) and relying on that person to provide the final ball.
Sadly this year that 'moment' or responsibility has been left to Navas or the full backs. I have lost count of the number of times Navas has failed to deliver both with his shots and crossing.
Secondly relying on the crispness of passing and the movement of players is fantastic when players are on song but not as effective when there is a lack of confidence or form of key individuals. The passing can become a bit pedestrian resulting in a packed defence not being shifted about to create an opening when two banks of four are sat on the edge of the 18 yard box. A player like Sterling would provide us with that bit of individual ability to beat a player which will give us another string in our armoury to open the door.
Chuck in also the fact he is homegrown (which we need this summer), his age (therefore likely sell-on value) the player probably has more value to us than other clubs.
35/40 million would be a good price for us and I think the club has realised buying lesser talents, more cheaply, has proven a false economy.
Good luck to the Scousers they probably thought 80 million for Suarez was great money/deal. Well one team was propelled to the treble and the other squandered the money on second rate players and finished out of Champs League.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.