franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 10,668
i know this isn't popular, but TAA does give us something different - there's not many players that have the range of passing he does, he can create and score and set pieces are a major factor in tournaments. I would stick with him in the centre midfield role where we lack options.
The problem is when we he comes up against better, more intelligent players, for example Ruiz, Pedri, Musiala, Wirtz these players will be searching for the pockets of space between the centre halves and midfielders and having watched TAA at right back, where the majority of the play is In front of you, I’m not convinced in midfield he is tactically astute enough to be in the correct position to block the passing lanes are have an awareness of those players around him.
The conundrum is who plays there instead. To me it should have been Bellingham and Foden moved more centrally. Everything Bellingham did tonight could, which in the main was excellent, he could have achieved as a 6 instead of a 10.
It’s not a slight on TAA here because I think he should play midfield, as I don’t think right back suits his skill set but think he needs to serve his time and fully develop in that role. Without a doubt he is an incredible passer, but still too many Hollywood balls.
If you watch say a Rodri, Kroos in that role they get from A-C by playing the ball to B, building the play and giving players time to transition to more offensive positions.
TAA wants to go straight to C and it often affects the build up of the team. Xavi, Busquets, Modric all the greats play the same way. Playing the way we did tonight we lost control of the match. Hopefully a lesson learned for Thursday.
Last edited: