I’ve just watched again (further breaking me heart a tiny bit) and... you know... you may be right:
This just furthers my view that VAR can (And will) be manipulated to ensure certain outcomes. Maybe Sergio was actually offside, but because of how the broadcasters chose to review the incident (and the lack of transparency from VAR), we’ll never know for sure *how* they checked to confirm (that is, when did they freeze frame to assess).
It does look like the ball was on the right side of Bernie’s leg for the frame used by the broadcasters, rather than the left side which would be in line with accepted practice for offside calls (when the ball leaves the foot, not when it makes contact)... the latter might have put Sergio onside and the goal would have stood.
The image you’re looking at is clearly not taken when the ball is played by Bernardo. The ball hadn’t even touched him, let alone bounced off him (rule - when the ball is played), so you’re talking complete and utter bollocks. The ball is the wrong side of his leg unless he played it back to Eriksen which he clearly didn’t.
Sorry, Alf. :-/That has made me all angry again now, cheers :(
I have a feeling we will get stitched up in the league
Just in case anyone wanted to be more frustrated this morning, compare and contrast VAR’s decision last night with VAR’s decision in the away leg.
(Also: notice where the ball is in the freeze frame for their goal, and where it is for our goal; hint — Sergio was running *back* from an offside position.)
I think we all know the answer to that question (see last season for more information).
Could apply to both.still looks slightly offside to me mate.