A
A
Anonymous
Guest
franksinatra said:Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:George Hannah said:It's co-ordinated alright but you don't have to accept that - it is a shared agenda which has exactly the same effect
I doubt it's co-ordinated but it is clear that individuals in the RagDipperMeedya only want to publish or broadcast a story that has a negative slant. They are all buying into the KickMCFC Hymn Book Revised Edition or the European Edition.
Full page story in the DT this morning about Pellers, the main thrust of which is that he should expect the sack
I'm not defending Pellers in any way but does anyone recall an article about sacking Bodgers or Moyes? There are two approaches that the RagDipper Meedya employ. The interesting, positive, sympathetic article, depending on the result for teams like The Rags, The Dippers, Spurs or the Arse. CFC also get a decent press because Moaninho is a darling of the Press Corps and haven't BT signed him up for some chinwaggery? For City when there is a blazing demolition of a team we might get a lone journo singing our praises, but most times it's stiletto between the ribs.
There were loads about Moyes potentially getting the sack. You just chose to forget them as it suit your argument.
Not in October/November there wasn't.
As soon as there were articles about him getting the boot I knew the journists had been given their orders from the PR machine at the swamp.
Wasn't it Mark Ogden who tweeted the sad news first?